29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 15 The Uterus 557

A

B

C

FIG. 15.29 Post–Cesarean Section Findings. (A) Normal lower

uterine segment indings. Sagittal TVS 3 weeks after cesarean delivery

shows echogenic areas (arrow) in the lower uterine segment due to

sutures. (B) Sagittal TVS several weeks after cesarean delivery shows

a heterogeneous mass (H) in the lower uterine segment anteriorly

due to a bladder lap hematoma. See also Video 15.13. (C) Subfascial

hematoma. Sagittal midline image from TAS in a patient with a

signiicant hematocrit drop after cesarean section. There is a large

heterogeneous mass anterior to the uterus, due to a subfascial

hematoma (H). (C reproduced with permission from Brown DL. Pelvic

ultrasound in the postabortion and postpartum patient. Ultrasound

Q. 2005;21(1):27-37. 190 )

signiicant. he size above which hematomas tend to be clinically

important is uncertain, although it has been suggested that

hematomas smaller than 4 cm 202 are unlikely to be clinically

signiicant. Subfascial hematomas are thought to be due to

disruption of inferior epigastric vessels and are located extraperitoneally.

203 hey can appear as a mass of variable echogenicity,

located posterior to the rectus abdominal muscles of the lower

abdominal wall (see Fig. 15.29C). Subfascial and bladder lap

hematomas may occur in the same patient, but it is important

to distinguish them if surgical treatment is planned, because the

approach is diferent. 203,204

Ater several months, when healing is complete, a thin linear

echo representing the hysterotomy scar can oten be seen in the

lower uterine segment 205 and is a normal, expected inding (Fig.

15.30A). More than one scar may be seen in patients with multiple

prior cesarean deliveries. he myometrium superior to the scar,

or between two adjacent scars, may have a convex outer contour

and potentially be mistaken for a leiomyoma 204,206 (Fig. 15.30B–C).

Fluid sometimes accumulates in the scar, either spontaneously

or during SHG. Variable terminology has been used to describe

this collection of luid in the scar: cesarean scar diverticuli,

cesarean scar pouch, cesarean scar defect, uterine niche, and

isthmocele. 207-211 In general, this entity is considered present

when luid extends into a triangular defect in the anterior lower

uterine segment (Fig. 15.30D); however, there is no standard

deinition. 211 It is also unclear whether such a “defect” is necessarily

abnormal because many patients are asymptomatic. 211 However,

these may cause intermenstrual bleeding and can be treated

surgically. 211 Cesarean scar defects might also be a cause of

dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, or infertility. 211 Larger defects,

with thinner myometrium, seem to be associated with a higher

likelihood of uterine rupture or dehiscence in a subsequent

pregnancy, but it is not yet clear how this should afect clinical

practice. 212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!