29.12.2021 Views

Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 55 The Pediatric Hip and Other Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Applications 1929

A

B

C

FIG. 55.4 Hip Anterior Views—Anterior Axial With Flexion and Abduction. (A) Scan area (dotted lines) on a computed tomography (CT)

scan. a, Acetabulum; A, anterior; L, lateral; m, metaphysis. (B) Normal hip sonogram shows sonolucent femoral head (H) bordered by metaphysis

(m) laterally and acetabulum (a) medially. (C) Dislocated hip sonogram shows posterior displacement of femoral head (H) and metaphysis (m).

be noted. Deformity and increased echogenicity of the cartilage

are indications of more severe acetabular dysplasia.

Evaluation During Treatment

he usefulness of sonography in the follow-up of infants with

DDH, whether for observation of resolving abnormality or in

conjunction with a deined treatment regimen, is widely accepted.

Currently, sonography is routinely used to follow borderline

cases, particularly in very young infants, before a commitment

is made to a treatment regimen. When treatment is indicated,

ultrasound is typically used to monitor hip position during

treatment. Dynamic splints, such as the Pavlik harness, hold the

hip in a lexed abducted position. hese restraints and similar

devices are popular, and ultrasound has been tested as a way of

monitoring hip position for infants in splint devices. 34,39,40 he

sonographic examination in these patients is limited to the

transverse/lexion and coronal/lexion views. he stress portion

of the examination should not be performed unless requested.

Typically, stress is not used until the conclusion of treatment,

when weaning from the harness is instituted.

One of the problems with follow-up sonography has been its

reliability in morphologic assessment of the bony acetabulum.

Reports of discrepancies between the sonographic appearance

of the bony acetabulum and the radiographic appearance

indicate inexact correlation. 34 his may result from observer

variation and the nature of the ultrasound measurements. he

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guideline

states that at 4 to 6 months of age it is appropriate to shit to

the radiograph when following a patient. 41 We have chosen to

include the pelvic radiograph as a baseline toward the end of the

treatment protocol. he older the infant, the more we tend to

consider radiography, particularly when the ossiication centers

are large. Ater successful treatment, continued monitoring of

acetabular development by periodic radiographs is prudent.

Residual acetabular dysplasia is reported in a small number

of patients. 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!