Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

CHAPTER 42 Fetal Measurements 1463
108. Modanlou HD, Dorchester WL, horosian A, Freeman RK. Macrosomia—
maternal, fetal, and neonatal implications. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;55(4):
420-424.
109. Deter RL, Hadlock FP. Use of ultrasound in the detection of macrosomia:
a review. J Clin Ultrasound. 1985;13(8):519-524.
110. Golditch IM, Kirkman K. he large fetus. Management and outcome. Obstet
Gynecol Surv. 1979;34(2):137-139.
111. Rodriguez MH. Ultrasound evaluation of the postdate pregnancy. Clin
Obstet Gynecol. 1989;32(2):257-261.
112. Arias F. Predictability of complications associated with prolongation of
pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70(1):101-106.
113. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA. Risk factors for shoulder dystocia in
the average-weight infant. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(5):614-618.
114. Gross SJ, Shime J, Farine D. Shoulder dystocia: predictors and outcome.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156(2):334-336.
115. Miller JM Jr, Korndorfer Jr FA, Kissling GE, et al. Recognition of the
overgrown fetus: in utero ponderal indices. Am J Perinatol. 1987;
4(2):86-89.
116. Miller JM, Korndorfer FA, Gabert HA. Fetal weight estimates in late
pregnancy with emphasis on macrosomia. J Clin Ultrasound. 1986;14(6):
437-442.
117. Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Fetal growth disturbances. Semin Roentgenol.
1990;25(4):309-316.
118. Miller J, Korndorfer F, Kissling G, et al. Recognition of the overgrown
fetus: in utero ponderal indices. Am J Perinatol. 1987;4(2):86-89.
119. Chamberlain PF, Manning FA, Morrison I, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of
amniotic luid volume. II. he relationship of increased amniotic luid volume
to perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150(3):250-254.
120. Benson CB, Coughlin BF, Doubilet PM. Amniotic luid volume in largefor-gestational-age
fetuses of nondiabetic mothers. J Ultrasound Med.
1991;10(3):149-151.
121. Miller Jr JM, Brown HL, Khawli OF, et al. Ultrasonographic identiication
of the macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(5):1110-1114.
122. Chauhan SP, West DJ, Scardo JA, et al. Antepartum detection of macrosomic
fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including sot-tissue measurements. Obstet
Gynecol. 2000;95(5):639-642.
123. Benson CB, Coughlin BF, Doubilet PM. Amniotic luid volume in largefor-gestational-age
fetuses of nondiabetic mothers. J Ultrasound Med.
1991;10(3):149-151.
124. Miller Jr JM, Kissling GA, Brown HL, Gabert HA. Estimated fetal weight:
applicability to small- and large-for-gestational-age fetus. J Clin Ultrasound.
1988;16(2):95-97.
125. Basel D, Lederer R, Diamant YZ. Longitudinal ultrasonic biometry of various
parameters in fetuses with abnormal growth rate. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand. 1987;66(2):143-149.
126. Elliott JP, Garite TJ, Freeman RK, et al. Ultrasonic prediction of fetal
macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60(2):159-162.
127. Bochner CJ, Medearis AL, Williams J, et al. Early third-trimester ultrasound
screening in gestational diabetes to determine the risk of macrosomia and
labor dystocia at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(3):703-708.
128. Sandmire HF, O’Halloin TJ. Shoulder dystocia: its incidence and associated
risk factors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988;26(1):65-73.
129. Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Depp R, et al. Diabetic macrosomia: accuracy
of third trimester ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(6):828-832.
130. Bracero LA, Baxi LV, Rey HR, Yeh MN. Use of ultrasound in antenatal
diagnosis of large-for-gestational age infants in diabetic gravid patients.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152(1):43-47.
131. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH, et al. Femur length/abdominal
circumference ratio. Poor predictor of macrosomic fetuses in diabetic
mothers. J Ultrasound Med. 1986;5(3):141-144.
132. Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA. Sonographic EFW and
macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
J Matern Fetal Med. 2000;9(1):55-61.
133. Colman A, Maharaj D, Hutton J, Tuohy J. Reliability of ultrasound estimation
of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies. N Z Med J. 2006;119(1241):
U2146.
134. Lockwood CJ, Weiner S. Assessment of fetal growth. Clin Perinatol.
1986;13(1):3-35.
135. Lin C. Current concepts of fetal growth restriction: part I. Causes, classiication,
and pathophysiology. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(6):1044-1055.
136. Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, et al. he risk of intrauterine fetal
death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2012;207(4):318.e1-318.e6.
137. Reed K, Droegmueller W. Intrauterine growth retardation. In: Centrullo
CL, Sbarra AJ, editors. he problem-oriented medical record. New York:
Plenum; 1984. p. 175-194.
138. Seeds JW. Impaired fetal growth: deinition and clinical diagnosis. Obstet
Gynecol. 1984;64(3):303-310.
139. Dobson PC, Abell DA, Beischer NA. Mortality and morbidity of fetal growth
retardation. Austr N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;21(2):69-72.
140. Berkley E, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad A. Doppler assessment of the fetus with
intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):
300-308.
141. Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Saltzman DH. Intrauterine growth retardation:
predictive value of US criteria for antenatal diagnosis. Radiology.
1986;160(2):415-417.
142. Benson CB, Boswell SB, Brown DL, et al. Improved prediction of intrauterine
growth retardation with use of multiple parameters. Radiology. 1988;
168(1):7-12.
143. Benson CB, Belville JS, Lentini JF, et al. Intrauterine growth retardation:
diagnosis based on multiple parameters—a prospective study. Radiology.
1990;177(2):499-502.
144. Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Sonographic evaluation of intrauterine growth
retardation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(3):709-717.
145. Manning FA. he fetal biophysical proile. UpToDate. 2015.
146. Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development
of a fetal biophysical proile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136(6):
787-795.
147. Manning FA, Baskett TF, Morrison I, Lange I. Fetal biophysical proile
scoring: a prospective study in 1,184 high-risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1981;140(3):289-294.
148. Everett TR, Peebles DM. Antenatal tests of fetal wellbeing. Semin Fetal
Neonatal Med. 2015;20(3):138-143.
149. Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, et al. Fetal assessment based on
fetal biophysical proile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk
pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1987;157(4):880-884.
150. Seravalli V, Baschat AA. A uniform management approach to optimize
outcome in fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am.
2015;42(2):275-288.
151. Subtil D, Tiberghien P, Devos P, et al. Immediate and delayed efects of
antenatal corticosteroids on fetal heart rate: a randomized trial that compares
betamethasone acetate and phosphate, betamethasone phosphate, and
dexamethasone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(2):524-531.
152. Mulder EJH, Derks JB, Visser GHA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy and
fetal behaviour: a randomised study of the efects of betamethasone and
dexamethasone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(11):1239-1247.
153. Senat MV, Minoui S, Multon O, et al. Efect of dexamethasone and betamethasone
on fetal heart rate variability in preterm labour: a randomised
study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(7):749-755.
154. Rotmensch S, Liberati M, Vishne TH, et al. he efect of betamethasone
and dexamethasone on fetal heart rate patterns and biophysical activities:
a prospective randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;
78(6):493-500.
155. Rotmensch S, Lev S, Kovo M, et al. Efect of betamethasone administration
on fetal heart rate tracing: a blinded longitudinal study. Fetal Diagn her.
2005;20(5):371-376.
156. Maulik D. Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery for fetal surveillance.
UpToDate. 2015.
157. Maulik DEV, Mundy D, Heitmann E, Maulik D. Evidence-based approach
to umbilical artery Doppler fetal surveillance in high-risk pregnancies: an
update. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(4):869-878.
158. Dahlbäck C, Pihlsgård M, Gudmundsson S. Abnormal ductus venosus
pulsatility index in the absence of concurrent umbilical vein pulsations
does not indicate worsening fetal condition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2013;42(3):322-328.