Diagnostic ultrasound ( PDFDrive )

816 PART III Small Parts, Carotid Artery, and Peripheral Vessel Sonography
40. Ma X, Liu R, Zhu C, et al. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced sonography
for diferentiation of breast lesions: a meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med.
2016;35(10):2095-2102.
41. Sever AR, Mills P, Weeks J, et al. Preoperative needle biopsy of sentinel
lymph nodes using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced
ultrasound in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;
199(2):465-470.
42. Zhou SC, Le J, Fan YW, et al. Study on breast cancer animal model of tumormicro
vessel variation before and ater the chemotherapy by contrast enhanced
ultrasound quantitative analysis. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2016;29(4 Suppl.):
1407-1413.
43. D’Orsi C, Sickles E, Mendelson E, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, breast imaging
reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology;
2013.
44. Hughes LE, Mansel RE, Webster DJ. Aberrations of normal development
and involution (ANDI): a new perspective on pathogenesis and nomenclature
of benign breast disorders. Lancet. 1987;2(8571):1316-1319.
45. Stavros AT, hickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: use of
sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology.
1995;196(1):123-134.
46. Berg WA, Sechtin AG, Marques H, Zhang Z. Cystic breast masses
and the ACRIN 6666 experience. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48(5):
931-987.
47. Kim MJ, Kim EK, Youk JH, et al. Application of power Doppler vocal fremitus
sonography in breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(7):897-
906.
48. Laforga JB, Aranda FI, Sevilla F. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: report
of two cases with prominent cystic changes and intranuclear inclusions.
Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;19(1):55-58.
49. Eiada R, Chong J, Kulkarni S, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast: MRI,
ultrasound, and mammographic appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2012;198(2):264-271.
50. Berg WA, Campassi CI, Iofe OB. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographicpathologic
correlation. Radiology. 2003;227(1):183-191.
51. Irshad A, Leddy R, Pisano E, et al. Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting
the biological behavior of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):
284-290.
52. Zhang L, Li J, Xiao Y, et al. Identifying ultrasound and clinical features of
breast cancer molecular subtypes by ensemble decision. Sci Rep. 2015;5:
11085.
53. Lam WW, Chu WC, Tse GM, Ma TK. Sonographic appearance of mucinous
carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(4):1069-
1074.
54. Meyer JE, Amin E, Lindfors KK, et al. Medullary carcinoma of the breast:
mammographic and US appearance. Radiology. 1989;170(1 Pt 1):79-82.
55. Alsharif S, Daghistani R, Kamberoglu EA, et al. Mammographic, sonographic
and MR imaging features of invasive micropapillary breast cancer. Eur J
Radiol. 2014;83(8):1375-1380.
56. Gao Y, Slanetz PJ, Eisenberg RL. Echogenic breast masses at US: to biopsy
or not to biopsy? Radiographics. 2013;33(2):419-434.
57. Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB. Utility of targeted sonography in the
evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(5):521-526.
58. Soo MS, Rosen EL, Baker JA, et al. Negative predictive value of sonography
with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 2001;177(5):1167-1170.
59. Lehman CD, Lee CI, Loving VA, et al. Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound
for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5):1169-1177.
60. Cilotti A, Marini C, Marinari A, et al. [Correlation of ultrasound and
galactography in the diagnosis of nipple discharge. Preliminary results].
Radiol Med. 1999;98(4):248-254.
61. Patel BK, Falcon S, Drukteinis J. Management of nipple discharge and the
associated imaging indings. Am J Med. 2015;128(4):353-360.
62. Rissanen T, Reinikainen H, Apaja-Sarkkinen M. Breast sonography in localizing
the cause of nipple discharge: comparison with galactography in 52 patients.
J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26(8):1031-1039.
63. Lequin MH, van Spengler J, van Pel R, et al. Mammographic and sonographic
spectrum of non-peurperal mastitis. Eur J Radiol. 1995;138-142.
64. Crowe DJ, Helvie MA, Wilson TE. Breast infection. Mammographic and
sonographic indings with clinical correlation. Invest Radiol. 1995;30(10):
582-587.
65. Hayes R, Michell M, Nunnerley HB. Acute inlammation of the breast—the
role of breast ultrasound in diagnosis and management. Clin Radiol.
1991;44(4):253-256.
66. Ahn CY, DeBruhl ND, Gorczyca DP, et al. Comparative silicone breast implant
evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging:
experience with 59 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(5):620-627.
67. Caskey CI, Berg WA, Anderson ND, et al. Breast implant rupture: diagnosis
with US. Radiology. 1994;190(3):819-823.
68. Chung KC, Wilkins EG, Beil Jr RJ, et al. Diagnosis of silicone gel breast
implant rupture by ultrasonography. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(1):
104-109.
69. DeBruhl ND, Gorczyca DP, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants: US
evaluation. Radiology. 1993;189(1):95-98.
70. Leibman AJ, Kruse B. Breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic indings
ater augmentation mammoplasty. Radiology. 1990;174(1):195-198.
71. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR
imaging. Radiology. 1992;185(2):407-410.
72. Yang N, Muradali D. he augmented breast: a pictorial review of the abnormal
and unusual. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(4):W451-W460.
73. Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging
screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed
breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer
detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(33):
5640-5649.
74. Hlawatsch A, Teike A, Schmidt M, helen M. Preoperative assessment of
breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2002;179(6):1493-1501.
75. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography,
clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative
assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233(3):830-849.
76. Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG. Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast
cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients.
Radiology. 2002;224(2):569-576.
77. Fornage BD. Local and regional staging of invasive breast cancer with
sonography: 25 years of practice at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Oncologist.
2014;19(1):5-15.
78. Park SH, Kim EK, Park BW, et al. False negative results in axillary lymph
nodes by ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided ine-needle aspiration
in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(6):
559-567.
79. Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, et al. Locoregional recurrence ater
sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients
with sentinel lymph node metastases: long-term follow-up from the American
College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized
Trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):413-420.
80. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary
dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis:
a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305(6):569-575.
81. Cools-Lartigue J, Meterissian S. Accuracy of axillary ultrasound in the diagnosis
of nodal metastasis in invasive breast cancer: a review. World J Surg.
2012;36(1):46-54.
82. Cools-Lartigue J, Sinclair A, Trabulsi N, et al. Preoperative axillary ultrasound
and ine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary metastases in
patients with breast cancer: predictors of accuracy and future implications.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):819-827.
83. American Society of Breast Surgeons. Consensus statement on management
of the axilla in patients with invasive breast cancer. 2011. Available
from: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/new_layout/about/statements/PDF
_Statements/Axillary_Management.pdf. Accessed on 10/1/16.
84. Whitman G, Lua T, Adejolu M, et al. Lymph node sonography. Ultrasound
Clin. 2011;6:369-380.
85. Cho N, Moon WK, Han W, et al. Preoperative sonographic classiication of
axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: node-to-node correlation
with surgical histology and sentinel node biopsy results. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
2009;193(6):1731-1737.