4. Uluslararası Beyaz Et Kongresi

Inbreeding. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1985; 13(4): p. 371-381.
27. Millman S, Duncan I, Widowski T. Male broiler breeder fowl display high levels of aggression
toward females. Poultry science 2000; 79(9): p. 1233-1241.
28. Millman ST, Duncan IJ. Effect of male-to-male aggressiveness and feed-restriction during
rearing on sexual behaviour and aggressiveness towards females by male domestic fowl.
Applied animal behaviour science 2000; 70(1): p. 63-82.
29. Hamilton WD, Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science
1982; 218(4570): p. 384-387.
30. Moller AP. Directional selection on directional asymmetry: testes size and secondary sexual
characters in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences
1994; 258(1352): p. 147-151.
31. McGary S, Estevez I, Bakst M, Pollock D. Phenotypic traits as reliable indicators of fertility
in male broiler breeders. Poultry science 2002; 81(1): p. 102-111.
32. Zuk M, Johnsen TS, Maclarty T. Endocrine-immune interactions, ornaments and mate choice
in red jungle fowl. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 1995;
260(1358): p. 205-210.
33. Ligon JD, Thornhill R, Zuk M, Johnson K. Male-male competition, ornamentation and the
role of testosterone in sexual selection in red jungle fowl. Animal Behaviour 1990; 40(2): p.
367-373.
34. Johnsen TS, Zuk M, Fessler EA. Social dominance, male behaviour and mating in mixed-sex
flocks of red jungle fowl. Behaviour 2001; 138(1): p. 1-18.
35. Froman DP, Pizzari T, Feltmann AJ, Castillo-Juarez H, Birkhead TR. Sperm mobility:
mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male
status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London B: Biological Sciences 2002; 269(1491): p. 607-612.
36. King L, Sonstegard T, Smith E, Burt D, Lerner S, Donoghue A. Sperm mobility is predictive
of paternity efficiency in turkeys as determined by microsatellite genotype identification of
potential sires. British Poultry Science 2000; 41(S1): p. 13-14.
37. Parker H, Yeatman J, Schultz C, Zumwalt C, McDaniel C. Use of a sperm analyzer for
evaluating broiler breeder males. 2. Selection of young broiler breeder roosters for the sperm
quality index increases fertile egg production. Poultry science 2000; 79(5): p. 771-777.
38. Bowling E, Froman D, Davis A, Wilson J. Attributes of broiler breeder males characterized
by low and high sperm mobility. Poultry science 2003; 82(11): p. 1796-1801.
39. Bilcik B, Estevez I. Impact of male–male competition and morphological traits on mating
strategies and reproductive success in broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science
2005; 92(4): p. 307-323.
40. Moyle J, Yoho D, Harper R, Bramwell R. Mating behavior in commercial broiler breeders:
Female effects. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2010; 19(1): p. 24-29.
41. Casanovas P. Management techniques to improve male mating activity and compensate for
the age-related decline in broiler breeder fertility: Intra - Spiking. The Poultry Informed
Professional 2002; 63: p. 1-9.
42. Brillard J. Natural mating in broiler breeders: present and future concerns. World’s Poultry
Science Journal 2004; 60(04): p. 439-445.
692