27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This trend towards greater reliance <strong>on</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-nuclear<br />

forces was accentuated <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> enabled by the marked<br />

qualitative improvements in U.S. c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al forces<br />

that began in the early 1970s with the so-called “Revoluti<strong>on</strong><br />

in Military Affairs.” The exploitati<strong>on</strong> of this<br />

sea-change in technology promised to arm U.S. <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

allied c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al forces with capabilities in: precisi<strong>on</strong><br />

delivery of muniti<strong>on</strong>s; comm<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trol of<br />

forces <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> weap<strong>on</strong>s; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, intelligence, surveillance,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rec<strong>on</strong>naissance that would vastly improve the<br />

lethality <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> effectiveness of n<strong>on</strong>-nuclear forces, c<strong>on</strong>siderably<br />

narrowing the missi<strong>on</strong>s for which nuclear<br />

weap<strong>on</strong>s would be required. 17 To illustrate, 1950s- <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

1960s-era U.S. technology had suffered from delivery<br />

accuracies too modest for c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al weap<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

had thus required the destructive radii of nuclear<br />

weap<strong>on</strong>s to destroy targets, especially but not exclusively<br />

at l<strong>on</strong>ger ranges. With advances in technology,<br />

however, weap<strong>on</strong> accuracies greatly improved, allowing<br />

military missi<strong>on</strong>s previously allocated to nuclear<br />

forces to be replaced by highly accurate <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> therefore<br />

much less destructive c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al muniti<strong>on</strong>s. These<br />

advances allowed the United States to reduce its reliance<br />

<strong>on</strong> nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s to a degree not widely anticipated<br />

in the 1950s.<br />

Thus, beginning <strong>on</strong>ly gradually in the 1960s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

then progressing more rapidly through the 1970s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

into the 1980s, U.S. forces in the Pacific theater outside<br />

of Korea sought to dispense with nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s as<br />

a planned warfighting tool in c<strong>on</strong>tingencies short of<br />

large-scale war with the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> or the People’s<br />

Republic of China (PRC). As a result, the arsenal of<br />

U.S. nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s in the Pacific theater decreased<br />

by over half, from a peak of 3,200 in the late 1960s to<br />

1,200 by the late 1970s. 18 While U.S. forces maintained<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!