27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hungary, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Slovakia. The term “nesting” signifies<br />

that, beginning with this initial z<strong>on</strong>e, each successive<br />

z<strong>on</strong>e subsumes all the preceding z<strong>on</strong>es, plus adjacent<br />

states <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> military districts. Cumulative limits are assigned<br />

<strong>on</strong> holdings of treaty-limited ground-based<br />

equipment in each z<strong>on</strong>e. This c<strong>on</strong>struct has the effect<br />

of permitting free movement of equipment <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> units<br />

away from, but not towards, the central European regi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

which thus inhibits surprise attack in the area<br />

deemed, during the Cold War at least, to be the most<br />

vulnerable.<br />

The Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> (<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> subsequently the Russian<br />

Federati<strong>on</strong>) further accepted a fifth z<strong>on</strong>e, the so-called<br />

“flank z<strong>on</strong>e.” This porti<strong>on</strong> of the agreement places<br />

limits <strong>on</strong> ground-based systems in the Leningrad <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

North Caucasus Military Districts in the Russian Federati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Norway is part of the northern porti<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

flank z<strong>on</strong>e, while the north Caucasus states (i.e., Turkey,<br />

Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Moldova) are in<br />

the southern porti<strong>on</strong>. Limitati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> helicopters <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

attack aircraft apply <strong>on</strong>ly to the entire area of applicati<strong>on</strong><br />

due to their ability to repositi<strong>on</strong> rapidly.<br />

One year after the signing of the initial agreement<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> as treaty implementati<strong>on</strong> was commencing, Russian<br />

leaders began arguing for adjustments to their<br />

equipment limits. They began pressing c<strong>on</strong>cerns<br />

about Russia’s equipment limitati<strong>on</strong>s, particularly in<br />

the flank regi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Moscow undertook a campaign<br />

to alter those limits. A final compromise was achieved<br />

at the first Review C<strong>on</strong>ference in May 1996 that permitted<br />

Russia higher force levels in the flank z<strong>on</strong>e,<br />

established a May 1999 deadline for Moscow to meet<br />

these adjusted levels, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> reduced the overall size<br />

of the flank z<strong>on</strong>e. Still, the problem of Russian force<br />

levels in this area has c<strong>on</strong>tinued to be a major issue.<br />

486

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!