27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it, the Allies were unlikely to agree in peacetime over<br />

the role <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> timing of TNW use. France’s withdrawal<br />

from <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s integrated military structure, the establishment<br />

of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Nuclear</str<strong>on</strong>g> Planning Group (NPG), <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the incorporati<strong>on</strong> of precisi<strong>on</strong>-guided muniti<strong>on</strong>s into<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> plans also facilitated inter-allied agreement.<br />

Meanwhile, popular oppositi<strong>on</strong> cancelled the proposed<br />

U.S. Enhanced Radiati<strong>on</strong> Warheads (“neutr<strong>on</strong><br />

bombs”), which might have increased the utility of<br />

TNWs against Soviet armored forces. The Soviet-NA-<br />

TO détente of the 1970s enabled mutual reducti<strong>on</strong>s in<br />

nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> governments chose<br />

to relinquish much of their TNW capacity in order to<br />

lubricate the prospects of modernizing their intermediate<br />

nuclear forces (INF) in resp<strong>on</strong>se to a comparable<br />

Soviet INF modernizati<strong>on</strong> effort, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> later to improve<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>s with a rapidly changing Russia. The December<br />

1979 <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> foreign <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> defense ministers meeting<br />

decided to deploy 572 American ground-launched<br />

cruise missiles (GLCMs) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pershing 2 intermediaterange<br />

missiles, while undertaking arms c<strong>on</strong>trol negotiati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

with the Uni<strong>on</strong> of Soviet Socialist Republics<br />

(USSR). They unilaterally withdrew 1,000 U.S. TNWs<br />

from Europe. At their October 1983 M<strong>on</strong>tebello meeting,<br />

the NPG announced that, without a breakthrough<br />

in the INF talks, the deployments of Pershing 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the GLCMs would proceed, but announced that another<br />

1,400 American tactical warheads would be<br />

withdrawn.<br />

The INF Treaty of December 1987 banned all U.S.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Soviet ground-based ballistic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> cruise missiles<br />

with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (km). <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> Supreme<br />

Allied Comm<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>er Europe (SACEUR) General<br />

Bernard Rogers recommended that <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> implement<br />

the sec<strong>on</strong>d half of the 1983 M<strong>on</strong>tebello decisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!