27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

although it decided that the remaining short-range<br />

systems, as well as c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al forces, should be<br />

modernized. The Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Warsaw Pact<br />

would so<strong>on</strong> collapse, ending the Cold War, so this decisi<strong>on</strong><br />

was never carried out.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g>-Soviet Doctrinal Jousting. The l<strong>on</strong>g-term<br />

background process which made it militarily acceptable<br />

to withdraw so many TNFs was <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s eventual<br />

improvement of its c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al capabilities that,<br />

spurred by Warsaw Pact equipment improvements<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> doctrinal innovati<strong>on</strong>s, resulted from Western<br />

technical <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, especially American, electr<strong>on</strong>ic advantages.<br />

While c<strong>on</strong>tinuing to exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> their theater nuclear<br />

capabilities, the Soviet General Staff, led by Marshal<br />

Nikolai Ogarkov, seems to have c<strong>on</strong>cluded in the late<br />

1970s that their most effective opti<strong>on</strong> against <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

would be c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al but extremely rapid deep operati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

c<strong>on</strong>ducted, after massive aerial surprise attacks,<br />

by operati<strong>on</strong>al maneuver groups. A tactical nuclear<br />

exchange could <strong>on</strong>ly slow this offensive down,<br />

as well as carrying the obvious risk of total nuclear<br />

war. As Catherine Kelleher described the Soviet perspective,<br />

“Ogarkov knew that many in <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> doubted<br />

that their political leaders would agree quickly to<br />

use nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s.” 100 The Soviets would fight <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

pace “the war in such a way as to delay <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> taking<br />

the decisi<strong>on</strong> to use nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s until it was too<br />

late for them to be able to influence the outcome of<br />

the war.” 101 Ogarkov advertised the forces developed<br />

for this strategy as part of the military propag<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>a<br />

surrounding Exercise Zapad 1981, by which time of<br />

course <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> had to take account of the additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

inhibitive effect of the SS-20s discussed earlier.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> sought to frustrate that Soviet strategic visi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

whose operati<strong>on</strong>al details had been fully trans-<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!