27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the last century; “There [can] be no greater calam-<br />

There [can] be no greater calamity<br />

than for the free peoples, the enlightened, independent,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> peace-loving peoples, to disarm while<br />

yet leaving it open to any barbarism or despotism to<br />

remain armed.” 31 In that era (circa 1908), the Hague<br />

Peace c<strong>on</strong>ference had c<strong>on</strong>cluded, Andrew Carnegie<br />

was making plans to build the Peace Palace in The<br />

Hague, the Netherl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, many were writing that there<br />

would be no more wars. At the dedicati<strong>on</strong> of the Peace<br />

Palace in 1913, Carnegie predicted that the end of war<br />

was “as certain to come, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> come so<strong>on</strong>, as day follows<br />

night.” 32 Of course, less than a year later Europe<br />

was plunged into a catastrophic world war.<br />

Who would have predicted what the next 40 years<br />

would bring? There is no case that I know of in history<br />

where a nati<strong>on</strong> has been made secure by pursuing a<br />

policy of vulnerability. The tragic arc of history has<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strated that such is a sure path to destructi<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> enslavement.<br />

As stated in the <strong>Strategic</strong> C<strong>on</strong>cept, “Deterrence,<br />

based <strong>on</strong> an appropriate mix of nuclear <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

capabilities, remains a core element of our<br />

overall strategy.” 33 I believe <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> will maintain its<br />

nuclear deterrent at the minimum level sufficient to<br />

preserve peace <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> stability c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> in resp<strong>on</strong>se<br />

to the shifting <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> hopefully increasingly benign<br />

internati<strong>on</strong>al security envir<strong>on</strong>ment. The goal of<br />

the DDPR is to bolster or strengthen our security, not<br />

to maintain the status quo or diminish it. In this same<br />

c<strong>on</strong>text, the Alliance will c<strong>on</strong>tinue to examine innovative<br />

ways to maintain <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sustain a credible nuclear<br />

deterrent as <strong>on</strong>e part in <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s larger defense posture<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the principles of fair burden-sharing,<br />

the indivisibility of security, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maintaining a<br />

str<strong>on</strong>g transatlantic link.<br />

394

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!