27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Maintaining strategic deterrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> stability at<br />

reduced nuclear force levels;<br />

4. Strengthening regi<strong>on</strong>al deterrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> reassuring<br />

U.S. allies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> partners; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />

5. Sustaining a safe, secure, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> effective nuclear<br />

arsenal. 14<br />

It is the fourth objective <strong>on</strong> this list that we normally<br />

think of when we c<strong>on</strong>sider the role of NSNWs. The<br />

NPR stated that the United States is “fully committed<br />

to strengthening bilateral <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>al security ties<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> working with allies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> partners to adapt these<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships to 21st century challenges. Such security<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships are critical in deterring potential threats,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> can also serve our n<strong>on</strong>proliferati<strong>on</strong> goals.” 15 N<strong>on</strong>proliferati<strong>on</strong><br />

is served by dissuasi<strong>on</strong>—“dem<strong>on</strong>strating<br />

to neighboring states that their pursuit of nuclear<br />

weap<strong>on</strong>s will <strong>on</strong>ly undermine their goal of achieving<br />

military or political advantages”—<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> by reassurance<br />

to America’s n<strong>on</strong>-nuclear allies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> partners, assuring<br />

them “that their security interests can be protected<br />

without their own nuclear deterrent capabilities.” 16<br />

For nearly 60 years, the United States has provided<br />

a nuclear umbrella over its allies through a combinati<strong>on</strong><br />

of means—the strategic forces of the U.S. Triad,<br />

NSNWs deployed forward in key regi<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> U.S.-<br />

based nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s that could be deployed forward<br />

quickly to meet regi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>tingencies. As the<br />

NPR makes clear, the mix of deterrent means has varied<br />

over time <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> from regi<strong>on</strong> to regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

This l<strong>on</strong>g-st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing tangible commitment to U.S.<br />

allies in Europe, however, has been somewhat attenuated<br />

since the end of the Cold War by the reducti<strong>on</strong><br />

in the number, locati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> visibility of forwarddeployed<br />

U.S. nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s. Still, a small number<br />

335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!