27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Comm<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> in 2010. He c<strong>on</strong>tinued: “This is the visi<strong>on</strong><br />

of many people, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> I remind you that the dividing<br />

line between visi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> hallucinati<strong>on</strong> is never very<br />

clear.” 24<br />

THE DDPR PROCESS<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s core business, its rais<strong>on</strong> d’etre, is to protect<br />

our territory <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> our populati<strong>on</strong>s. . . . And in a world<br />

where nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s actually exist, <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> needs a<br />

credible, effective, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> safely managed deterrent. 25<br />

—Secretary General General Rasmussen,<br />

April 22, 2010<br />

Undoubtedly these issues will have a significant<br />

impact <strong>on</strong> the DDPR process as it moves forward towards<br />

the May 20, 2012, Summit in Chicago, IL. Nevertheless,<br />

as c<strong>on</strong>firmed by the new <strong>Strategic</strong> C<strong>on</strong>cept,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> remains a collective security alliance whose<br />

purpose, as embodied in Article V of the North Atlantic<br />

Treaty, is to defend the territorial integrity of<br />

all of its member states. To do so, <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> theoretically<br />

maintains military capabilities (1) to deter any attack,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, in the event deterrence fails, either (2) to defeat<br />

such an attack if it occurs, or (3) to c<strong>on</strong>vince the aggressor<br />

that it has miscalculated <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> that the costs of<br />

war far exceed any possible gains, thereby causing the<br />

aggressor to abort his attack.<br />

In many respects the DDPR process reflects a c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong><br />

of a c<strong>on</strong>stantly transforming <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> which<br />

began, in my view, with the end of the Cold War <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>tinues today. C<strong>on</strong>sistent themes are evident from<br />

past <strong>Strategic</strong> C<strong>on</strong>cepts, namely “security, c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

deterrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> defence, crisis management, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> partnership.”<br />

26<br />

389

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!