27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

thorized use. The massive shuffle of weap<strong>on</strong>s, which<br />

took place in the first half of 1990s, has l<strong>on</strong>g been over,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> there is no reas<strong>on</strong> to believe that some are still<br />

lying around unaccountable. Security of storage sites<br />

has been increased as well, often with U.S. assistance.<br />

Finally, there is c<strong>on</strong>cern about possible security<br />

threats associated with the large number of Russian<br />

NSNWs. These include several rather different problems.<br />

First, some states in <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> (the Baltic states,<br />

in particular) are troubled that Russia has deployed<br />

short-range (tactical) nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s (TNWs) close<br />

to their territories <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> plans to deploy more in Kaliningrad<br />

Oblast, an exclave of Russian territory between<br />

Lithuania <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pol<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>. This c<strong>on</strong>cern has <strong>on</strong>ce again<br />

heated up acutely after President Dmitri Medvedev in<br />

November 2011 threatened to deploy Isk<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>er tactical<br />

missiles in that regi<strong>on</strong> in resp<strong>on</strong>se to American plans<br />

to stati<strong>on</strong> missile defense assets in Europe 1 (a previous<br />

threat, in 2008, was withdrawn after the Barack<br />

Obama administrati<strong>on</strong> revised earlier plans for missile<br />

defense formulated under President George W.<br />

Bush).<br />

Other worries are more theoretical <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> have to do<br />

with the nature of TNWs, which militaries generally<br />

intend to embed with c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al forces during war.<br />

Specifically, there is fear that such weap<strong>on</strong>s could be<br />

released to troops in time of crisis <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> that authority to<br />

use them could be delegated to combatant comm<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ers.<br />

In this case, any acute crisis could easily result in<br />

the early use of nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s, especially if comm<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ers<br />

in the field fear losing such weap<strong>on</strong>s to a first<br />

strike by the United States <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g>. This apprehensi<strong>on</strong><br />

is underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>able, given not <strong>on</strong>ly the overwhelming<br />

qualitative superiority of U.S. c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al assets,<br />

but also the fact that the Russian military appears to<br />

ascribe to them almost mystical capabilities.<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!