27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Two of the greatest enduring threats to Alliance<br />

safety <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> security in the next 10 to 15 years are weap<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of mass destructi<strong>on</strong> (WMD) terrorism <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> WMD<br />

proliferati<strong>on</strong>. As the U.S. WMD commissi<strong>on</strong> report<br />

states, 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> as likewise reflected in <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Comprehensive<br />

<strong>Strategic</strong> Level Policy for Preventing the<br />

Proliferati<strong>on</strong> of WMD, proliferati<strong>on</strong> of such weap<strong>on</strong>s<br />

is inevitable, presenting increased risks to Allied security<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> strategic interests. We can slow <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> impede<br />

WMD proliferati<strong>on</strong>, but it will happen. This will in<br />

turn increase the likelihood of WMD terrorism. And<br />

of course we face the prospect of ballistic missile proliferati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

as in Iran <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> North Korea.<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to the enduring challenges of such<br />

proliferati<strong>on</strong>, uncertainties about the future relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />

with Russia c<strong>on</strong>tinue to worry eastern European<br />

members of the Alliance. While no nati<strong>on</strong> is c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

an adversary of the Alliance, the proliferati<strong>on</strong><br />

threat is real <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> growing, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> future c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al attacks<br />

against <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> forces or territory cannot be ruled<br />

out.<br />

While some <str<strong>on</strong>g>NATO</str<strong>on</strong>g> Allies c<strong>on</strong>tinue to press for<br />

finding a path to “global nuclear zero” (more <strong>on</strong> that<br />

later), press reports in Russia state that it will triple<br />

its strategic missile producti<strong>on</strong> between the years 2011<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2015. Russia is deploying new silo-based <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> mobile<br />

inter-c<strong>on</strong>tinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

new ballistic missile submarine with an advanced missile.<br />

By 2018, Russia plans to deploy a new “heavy”<br />

ICBM, which reportedly can carry 10-15 nuclear warheads.<br />

New advanced warheads are being deployed<br />

<strong>on</strong> other weap<strong>on</strong>s, including those of low yield. Russia<br />

today enjoys more than a 10-1 advantage in tactical<br />

or n<strong>on</strong>-strategic nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s (NSNWs) over<br />

the United States. While the United States pushed the<br />

“reset” butt<strong>on</strong> with Russia <strong>on</strong> cooperati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> part-<br />

377

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!