27.04.2015 Views

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

Tactical Nuclear Weapons and NATO.pdf - Program on Strategic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to direct Russian toward multilateral soluti<strong>on</strong>s to its<br />

security.<br />

The third <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> most directly related factor underlying<br />

the Russian positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> NSNWs relates to what we<br />

might call the military maladies of the Russian armed<br />

forces. As we saw above, new efforts <strong>on</strong> military reform<br />

began following the 2008 war with Georgia. This<br />

is probably no accident, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> so Russian activities in<br />

the so-called 5-day war provide a good example of a<br />

number of things related to the Russian military. For<br />

instance, even though Russian forces had been stati<strong>on</strong>ed<br />

in the Northern Caucasus <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> had engaged in<br />

military exercises prior to August 2008, the Russian<br />

military still appeared to be caught by surprise when<br />

the Georgians attacked <strong>on</strong> August 7. Russian analyst<br />

Fyodor Lukyanov puts the blame squarely <strong>on</strong> inc<strong>on</strong>sistencies<br />

in Russian policy, which, taken together<br />

with other factors listed below, served to cause hesitati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> to limit what the Russians could actually do<br />

<strong>on</strong>ce the war began. As Lykyanov noted at the time of<br />

the war:<br />

Ever since the disrupti<strong>on</strong> of the status quo that had<br />

been maintained in the c<strong>on</strong>flict z<strong>on</strong>es for about 10<br />

years, Russia’s policy has been getting increasingly<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tradictory. The desire to simultaneously play the<br />

role of a neutral mediator/peacekeeper <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a protector/guarantor<br />

of security in South Ossetia <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Abkhazia<br />

has been detrimental to both the former <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

the latter status. At some point, Moscow essentially<br />

stopped trying to help bring about a political settlement,<br />

placing its stakes <strong>on</strong> exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ing cooperati<strong>on</strong><br />

with Tskhinvali <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sukhumi <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> forestalling any<br />

outbreaks of tensi<strong>on</strong>. At the same time, Russia tried<br />

to formally stay within existing legal bounds, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

l<strong>on</strong>ger this went <strong>on</strong>, the more it came into c<strong>on</strong>flict with<br />

reality. 14<br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!