09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recent findings underline the importance <strong>of</strong> REM-sleep for procedural memory consolidation in<br />

young adults. In light <strong>of</strong> age-related declines in memory processing as well as REM-sleep this<br />

relationship was investigated in healthy older adults (60-85y/o; n=47). An augmentation <strong>of</strong><br />

REM-sleep was achieved physiologically through REM-rebound and pharmacologically by a<br />

placebo-controlled AChE-Inhibitor while performance in a procedural and declarative learning<br />

task was investigated before and after sleep. REM-sleep percentage proved to be significantly<br />

associated with performance-time in the morning procedural learning task after statistically<br />

controlling for evening performance (test1: r=-.310[p=.019]; test2: r=-.274[p=.035]; test3:<br />

r=-.441[p=.001]; test4: n.s.; test5: r=-.349*[p=.022]; test6: r=-.247; p=.055)).<br />

4113.3 Memory self-efficacy predicts memory performance: Results from a six-year follow-up<br />

study, Susanne A.M. Valentijn 1 , Robert D. Hill 2 , Susan A.H. Hooren 1 , Jelle Jolles 1 , Rudolf<br />

W.H.M. Ponds 3 , 1 European Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Neuroscience (EURON), Maastricht University,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, The Netherlands, 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Educational<br />

<strong>Psychology</strong>, University <strong>of</strong> Utah, USA, 3 Department <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charit?-<br />

University Medicine Berlin CBF, Germany<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to examine the relationship between memory self-efficacy (MSE)<br />

and a 6-year follow-up assessment <strong>of</strong> memory functioning in a sample <strong>of</strong> older Dutch persons.<br />

MSE was assessed by a Dutch abridged version <strong>of</strong> the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire<br />

(MIA). The total MSE score predicted memory performance at six years. A separate analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the different MSE subscales indicated that the MIA Change score was the most salient feature <strong>of</strong><br />

MSE. An extreme groups analysis <strong>of</strong> the MIA Change score revealed that those who perceived<br />

that their memory was deteriorating, scored worse across a memory task.<br />

4113.4 Subjective memory complaints and cognitive performance: Results from the Maastricht<br />

Aging Study, Martine E.M. Mol, Martin P.J. Van Boxtel, Jelle Jolles, European Graduate<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Neuroscience (EURON), Maastricht University, NL, Department <strong>of</strong> Psychiatry and<br />

Neuropsychology, The Netherlands<br />

Middle-aged and older people <strong>of</strong>ten worry that their diminishing memory may indicate incipient<br />

dementia. This study evaluates whether subjective memory complaints predict lower performance<br />

on memory and information processing speed tasks in a large cross-sectional and longitudinal<br />

study involving 401 subjects aged 55 to 85. Results at baseline show that subjects with memory<br />

complaints appear to perform worse in delayed recall compared to subjects without memory<br />

complaints. At 6-years follow-up, there was no significant difference in cognitive performance<br />

between these two groups, indicating that memory complaints are no predictor <strong>of</strong> cognitive<br />

impairment on the long term.<br />

4113.5 Effects <strong>of</strong> the timing and identity <strong>of</strong> retrieval cues in individual recall: An attempt to<br />

mimic cross-cuing in collaborative recall., Jan Andersson 1 , Graham Hitch 2 , Peter Meudell 3 ,<br />

1 2 3<br />

Swedeish Defence research Establishment, Sweden, Lancaster Univeristy, UK, Manchester<br />

University, UK<br />

Inhibitory effects in collaborative recall have been attributed to cross-cuing among partners, in the<br />

same way that part-set cues are known to impair recall in individuals. Cues had an inhibitory<br />

effect on recollection in the early part <strong>of</strong> the recall period. There was no difference between the<br />

1005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!