09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Zhao Hong 1 , Zhang Qi 2 , Hu Kezu 3 , 1 Dalian University, China; 2 Liaoning Nomal University,<br />

Chibna; 3 Tianjin University <strong>of</strong> Techenoledge Education<br />

Pupils always have difficulties when they face mathematical word problems. Reading skill is an<br />

very important factor which affect pupils doing their mathematical word problems. The purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to examine relations between reading skills and the abilities in mathematical word<br />

problems. We have pupils in a random sample(n=20) from fist to sixth Grades. The results show<br />

that pupils with reading disabilities always have difficulties in solving in mathematical word<br />

problems in every grade. The higher pupils' grade, the lower influence in mathematical word<br />

problems.<br />

1098.78 Re-study on framing effect: In extrinsic risk and intrinsic risk perspectives, Jinsong Li,<br />

Shanghai University <strong>of</strong> Finance and Economics, China<br />

Framing effect was one <strong>of</strong> the most important findings in decision making and supported by some<br />

empirical studies. However, there were some pendent issues about it, which relate to the different<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> risk. This study distinguished intrinsic risk from extrinsic risk and then re-studied<br />

the framing effect through a simulated experiment. Results showed that the framing effect was<br />

significant different from the extrinsic risk perspective and the framing effect attenuated while the<br />

risk degree and the outcome increased. The framing effect was not significant different from the<br />

intrinsic risk perspective. Decision maker was intrinsic- risk-averse in the positive frame as well<br />

as negative frame.<br />

1098.79 A study <strong>of</strong> purposeful character and self-control capacity, Shu Yi Li, Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Psychology</strong>, China<br />

Will is adjusting and control system <strong>of</strong> man's mentality and conduct. The adjustment and control<br />

over men's mentality and conduct is realized through the adjustment and control <strong>of</strong> cognition,<br />

emotion, conduct and mental activities. This article proposes that according to the mental process<br />

<strong>of</strong> purposeful action, through training <strong>of</strong> children's good purposeful characters and self-control<br />

abilities, the children's overall quality can be improved. The training <strong>of</strong> children's self-control<br />

abilities is to make children more clearly realize their abilities and characters and design their<br />

own-developing objectives according to their actual conditions so as to rouse their internal<br />

driving.<br />

1098.80 Preference and grammaticality judgments are differentially sensitive to different<br />

representational forms acquired in artificial grammar learning, Ayumi Yamada, Gakushuin<br />

University, Japan<br />

This study investigated what kind <strong>of</strong> knowledge is utilized by preference and grammaticality<br />

judgments in artificial grammar learning. Participants were presented with strings generated from<br />

a finite-state grammar and then made forced-choice preference or grammaticality judgments for<br />

pairs containing a grammatical string(target) and nongrammatical one(distracter). When<br />

distracters had invalid bigrams, grammaticality judgments resulted in higher target selection,<br />

compared with preference judgments. When distracters had valid bigrams in invalid locations,<br />

judgment type gave no differences target selection. The results suggest that preference judgments<br />

are mostly based on abstract rather than fragmentary knowledge whereas grammaticality<br />

judgments depend on both kinds <strong>of</strong> knowledge.<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!