09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecently found that pigeons’ post-reinforcement waiting contributes substantially to relative<br />

response rates in choice procedures: longer waits, and thus fewer responses, with longer delays to<br />

reinforcement. Computer simulations <strong>of</strong> wait-and-respond (WR) models on simple concurrent<br />

variable-interval schedules reproduced typical findings such as power matching. Here we report<br />

on the results <strong>of</strong> WR models applied to concurrent-chain schedules and problems such as<br />

reinforcement delay, self-control, and preference for variable times to reinforcement.<br />

1005.3 A selectionist model <strong>of</strong> choice, A. Machado, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal<br />

I will present a selectionist model <strong>of</strong> choice that is based on three assumptions. First, reponses<br />

replicate at the end <strong>of</strong> epochs whose length is inversely related to the overall reinforcement rate.<br />

Second, each response replicates in proportion to its local reinforcement rate. These assumptions<br />

imply that whereas overall reinforcement rate sets the tempo <strong>of</strong> learning, a Weber-like fraction in<br />

the domain <strong>of</strong> reinforcement rate sets its direction. And third, responses <strong>of</strong> one class may mutate<br />

into responses <strong>of</strong> another. The model accounts for a variety <strong>of</strong> results concerning steady-state<br />

choice behavior and the speed <strong>of</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> preference.<br />

1005.4 Behavioral versions <strong>of</strong> human decision making research, T. Sakagami, Keio University,<br />

Tokyo, Japan<br />

Experimental economists have pointed out several crucial differences between economic and<br />

cognitive approaches in decision making studies. We conducted a behavioral version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experiments for the certainty effect using Indonesian and Japanese students as subjects. Both<br />

populations previously showed the effect in paper and pencil questionnaires. The students were<br />

requested to respond to a computer display on a Web page containing two differently colored<br />

alternatives. Points could either be earned (Gain trials) or lost (Loss trials). Results revealed that a<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> participants showed the shift <strong>of</strong> preference from riskless to risky choice that is<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> the effect.<br />

1005.5 Procedural aspects <strong>of</strong> experiments on choice behavior, J.C. Todorov, Universidade de<br />

Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> studies on choice behavior involving human and animal subjects will be presented to<br />

show the importance <strong>of</strong> careful planning <strong>of</strong> contingencies and recording and reporting <strong>of</strong> results.<br />

In studies related to the matching law and infra-human subjects, with two concurrent schedules <strong>of</strong><br />

variable-interval reinforcement, some critical definitions are the consequences for changeovers,<br />

the discriminability <strong>of</strong> the different stimuli associated with the schedules <strong>of</strong> the concurrent pair,<br />

and the discriminability <strong>of</strong> the different operand associated with the four operants in the situation.<br />

When humans are used as subjects and procedural aspects are neglected there is the danger <strong>of</strong><br />

concluding erroneously that species differences are present.<br />

1006 INVITED SYMPOSIUM<br />

Scientific reasoning - Current research<br />

Convener and Chair: M. Bullock, USA<br />

1006.1 Scientific reasoning: From formal models to classroom instruction, D. Klahr 1 , Z. Chen 2 ,<br />

1 Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 2 University <strong>of</strong> California, Davis, CA, USA<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!