09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

designing new practices, individual and collective. To do this with the users, we developed and<br />

applied a new paradigm: experimental reality. This paper describes our experience <strong>of</strong> experimental<br />

reality in an experimental ‘<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the future’, where workers accepted being observed<br />

continuously, for periods up to 3 years, with video and other techniques. Designing for cognition<br />

necessitates understanding human behaviour in its systemic aspects and raises theoretical issues<br />

about objects, attention, and collaboration. We had to develop specific models and observation<br />

methods, and also deal with privacy issues.<br />

4020.6 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> communicative tools’ use in real social context, V. Nosulenko, E.<br />

Samoylenko, Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> <strong>of</strong> Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Moscow, Russia<br />

We evaluate the use <strong>of</strong> new interactive artifacts in the context <strong>of</strong> big public event. The study is<br />

based on the systematic paradigm including elements <strong>of</strong> an ethno-methodological observation and<br />

experimental procedures. Video data, free verbalizations and psychophysical data were integrated<br />

for the analysis. The results confirm that the artifact becomes an efficient tool when it could be<br />

related to current task <strong>of</strong> users. Transformations in the relations man-environment cannot be<br />

accounted for by mere presence <strong>of</strong> devices. The perceived features <strong>of</strong> device, that can change the<br />

functioning <strong>of</strong> the whole system, are determined by human goals and tasks.<br />

4021 INVITED SYMPOSIUM<br />

Cultural selfways: The conceptions <strong>of</strong> independence and interdependence reconsidered<br />

Convener and Chair: H. Keller, Germany<br />

Co-convener: T.S. Saraswathi, India<br />

4021.1 Independence and Interdependence as socialization goals, H. Keller, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany<br />

The conceptions <strong>of</strong> independence and interdependence are interpreted as socialization goals that<br />

specify culturally informed developmental pathways. They are considered as protopypical for<br />

particular ecocultural environments, i.e. urban Western middle class (independence) and rural<br />

farming communities (interdependence). Research results will be reported from ongoing cross<br />

cultural studies addressing the cultures <strong>of</strong> parenting with infants. Spot observations <strong>of</strong> infants daily<br />

environments, videobased interactional analyses and ethnographic interviews concerning parental<br />

ethnotheories constitute the database. The results confirm similarities <strong>of</strong> parenting theories and<br />

practices as related to the two conceptions. Historical and generational comparisons moreover<br />

confirm the combination <strong>of</strong> components <strong>of</strong> both models.<br />

4021.2 Autonomy and relatedness as two basic human needs, C. Kagitcibasi, Koc University,<br />

Istanbul, Turkey<br />

The debate on independence-interdependence in cross-cultural studies tends to confound two<br />

independent dimensions <strong>of</strong> interpersonal relations and self. One <strong>of</strong> these is interpersonal distance,<br />

ranging from relatedness (connectedness) with others to separateness. The other is agency, ranging<br />

from autonomy to heteronomy. The general assumption, informed by psychoanalytic thinking, is<br />

that autonomy requires separateness; however, this is neither logically nor psychologically<br />

necessary, given the independence <strong>of</strong> the two dimensions. The less well recognized combination<br />

847

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!