09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3044.2 A realistic social approach to personality judgment: Challenges, assumptions, assertions,<br />

and extensions, R.M. Furr 1 , D.C. Funder 2 , 1 Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA;<br />

2<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

In person perception, the study <strong>of</strong> accuracy was long interrupted by four core challenges -<br />

methodological ambiguity, criterion ambiguity, early preoccupation with the judge, and later<br />

preoccupation with cognition. The newer wave <strong>of</strong> research to address these challenges is based on<br />

five fundamental principles: traits exist and affect behavior, personality judgments come from<br />

behavioral observations, research should be based on multiple sources <strong>of</strong> data, personality<br />

judgment occurs within a social context, and accuracy depends on more than the judge and his or<br />

her cognitive processes. Emerging directions <strong>of</strong> accuracy research build upon this foundation.<br />

3044.3 Using the social relations model to study interpersonal perception, J.D. Korchmaros 1 ,<br />

D.A. Kenny 2 , 1 Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA; 2 University <strong>of</strong> Connecticut,<br />

Storrs, CT, USA<br />

The Social Relations Model (SRM) is a componential model <strong>of</strong> dyadic processes. When applied to<br />

interpersonal perception, the three components are a) perceiver (how it is that the person generally<br />

views others), b) target (how the person is generally viewed by others), and c) relationship (how<br />

the perceiver uniquely views the target). The perceiver and target components <strong>of</strong> the SRM refer to<br />

individual differences in perception. Using data from two studies <strong>of</strong> helping (one a zero<br />

acquaintance study and the other a dyadic interaction study), we describe how the model can be<br />

used to study individual differences. Several examples are presented.<br />

3044.4 Culture and self-regulatory thought, G. Oettingen 1, 2 , 1 New York University, New York,<br />

NY, USA; 2 University <strong>of</strong> Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany<br />

Fantasy realization theory holds that mentally contrasting a desired future with impeding reality<br />

makes people set binding goals in light <strong>of</strong> high expectations <strong>of</strong> success and refrain from goal<br />

setting in light <strong>of</strong> low expectations (Oettingen, 1999, 2000). Other forms <strong>of</strong> self-regulatory<br />

thought such as indulging in a desired future and dwelling on impeding reality lead to goal setting<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> expectations. Based on experiments supporting the model, I will analyze how<br />

cultural variables (e.g., values) impact on self-regulatory thought and how, in turn, self-regulatory<br />

thought entertained by members <strong>of</strong> a given culture influences the culture’s development.<br />

3044.5 Evidence for an evaluative bias against stimuli that do not ‘fit in’, M. Rubin, S. Paolini,<br />

R. Crisp, University <strong>of</strong> Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia; University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham, UK<br />

I present evidence that people make relatively negative judgments about stimuli that (a) have<br />

migrated from one category to another (migrant stimuli), (b) have been excluded from the<br />

category system (excluded stimuli), or (c) belong to multiple categories within the category<br />

system (transgressive stimuli). In three experiments (Ns = 30, 30, & 88), we asked participants to<br />

evaluate a series <strong>of</strong> letter or shape stimuli that were presented inside and outside related categories.<br />

We found most evidence in support <strong>of</strong> the migration hypothesis. I conclude by discussing the<br />

implications <strong>of</strong> this deviant stimulus bias for the perception <strong>of</strong> social stimuli.<br />

3045 INVITED SYMPOSIUM<br />

615

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!