09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A large body <strong>of</strong> research on the child’s “theory <strong>of</strong> mind” has been devoted over the last 20 years to<br />

why children younger than four years fail “false belief” tasks. Progress on this question has been<br />

limited because little attention has been paid to the prior question <strong>of</strong> how four-year-olds pass the<br />

task. I will outline a process model <strong>of</strong> how success on belief-desire reasoning tasks is achieved.<br />

This leads to new insight into why younger children fail.<br />

1013.3 Does the language we speak affect the way we think? L. Gleitman, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />

Recent commentary and experimentation in the topic-area <strong>of</strong> spatial organization has led some<br />

investigators to believe that differences in spatial terminology and grammar across languages<br />

influence memory and reasoning about spatial location and movement. Specifically, reasoning in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> ego-centered mental maps has been claimed to be difficult or impossible in such<br />

languages as Mayan Tzeltal which have no locutions such as “ to my left” or “behind me.” We<br />

present evidence showing that preliterate, monolingual Tzeltal speakers reason about space much<br />

as do speakers <strong>of</strong> other languages. These findings are discussed as they relate to the understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> how human language and thought interact.<br />

1013.4 Early learning, domain-specificity and relevance, R. Gelman, Rutgers University,<br />

Piscataway, NJ, USA<br />

Why do young children attend to the data they do? The idea that the information is salient begs the<br />

question. In order to avoid circularity, we have to assign salience in advance <strong>of</strong> what is learned.<br />

All learners, young or not, learn more about what they already know. Evidence is consistent with<br />

the conclusion that our young benefit from skeletal domain-specific structures. These draw<br />

attention to relevant data that can nurture learning coherent knowledge. Examples about numerical<br />

and causal reasoning buttress this account <strong>of</strong> learning during development.<br />

1014 INVITED SYMPOSIUM<br />

Computer-mediated knowledge communication<br />

Convener and Chair: H. Spada, Germany<br />

Co-convener: F.W. Hesse, Germany<br />

1014.1 Collaborative skill acquisition in a computer-mediated setting, H. Spada, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany<br />

Collaborative skill acquisition is a precondition if complex tasks have to be solved efficiently by<br />

persons working together in a computer-mediated setting. One aspect <strong>of</strong> good collaboration is the<br />

coordination <strong>of</strong> joint work like time management, and division <strong>of</strong> labor and roles; another<br />

concerns characteristics <strong>of</strong> the communication. But how to promote collaborative skill acquisition?<br />

Is unguided practice sufficient? Two instructional methods are proposed, observational learning<br />

from a best-practice example and scripted practice. These methods were applied and evaluated in a<br />

study with 36 dyads collaborating for several hours on a task, in which experts <strong>of</strong> different fields<br />

jointly solved psychiatric cases thereby communicating via a desktop video-conference (Rummel<br />

& Spada, 2003).<br />

1014.2 Conceptions about educational technology and its use in instruction, F.W. Hesse,<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!