09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

latter more frequently false recognized than new faces. But there were no significant differences in<br />

false recognition rates between 50% old-old morphed faces and old faces. Discussion focuses on<br />

psychological mechanism <strong>of</strong> false recognition <strong>of</strong> the morphed facial stimuli.<br />

5090 ORAL<br />

Attention and perception<br />

Chair: Pierre Van Elslande, France<br />

5090.1 Interaction between location and frequency information in auditory inhibition <strong>of</strong> return<br />

(IOR), Qi Chen 1 , Ming Zhang 2 , Xiaolin Zhou 3 , 1 Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong>, Peking University,<br />

China, 2 Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong>, Northeast Normal University, Chang Chun, China,<br />

3<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Psychology</strong> and Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University,<br />

China<br />

In a cue-target paradigm, this study investigated the interaction between location and<br />

frequency-based auditory inhibition <strong>of</strong> return (IOR).Participants were asked to perform detection,<br />

localization or frequency discrimination tasks. The results showed that in detection tasks, there<br />

was a IOR based on one feature dimension only if the cue and the target were identical on the<br />

other feature dimension. While in the discrimination task, IOR effects were evident for the<br />

task-relevant feature only if the cue and the target differed on the task-irrelevant features.<br />

Implications <strong>of</strong> these findings for information processing along the “where” and “what”pathways<br />

in the brain were discussed.<br />

5090.2 The executive inhibition <strong>of</strong> neutral and emotional interference, Xiang Zhou 1, 2 ,<br />

Theodore Cope 3 , Xuejun Bai 1 , Deli Shen 1 , 1 .Research Center For <strong>Psychology</strong> and Behavior,<br />

Tianjin Normal University. 2 .Department <strong>of</strong> education, Hainan Normal University., China,<br />

3<br />

Shaoxing University, China<br />

The study examined inhibitory processes <strong>of</strong> neutral and emotional interference by conducting a<br />

pictorial emotional Stroop paradigm. 24 participants (aged 18-23 yrs) were required to name the<br />

colors <strong>of</strong> filtered images consisting <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant pictures. All the<br />

pictures were chosen from the <strong>International</strong> Affective Picture System (IAPS, Lang, P.J., 2001) and<br />

rated by a pilot group <strong>of</strong> undergraduate students. Results indicated that inhibitions <strong>of</strong> neutral and<br />

emotional interference are significantly different. And the related paradigm shows promise as a<br />

nonlexical, ecologically valid approach to evaluating the selective processing <strong>of</strong> emotional<br />

distracters.<br />

5090.3 Subjective time density, Yury Druzhinin, Andrey Yegorov, IITP RAS, Russian<br />

Federation<br />

Subjective experience <strong>of</strong> time span duration was evaluated by comparing the durations <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluated past time span and the current time, estimated from the start point marker. The model <strong>of</strong><br />

transition between physical and subjective time span duration scales will be discussed. The<br />

subjects were asked to evaluate the reading duration for various texts. The differences in<br />

subjective time density may be interpreted as cognitive complexity measure <strong>of</strong> the information<br />

density.<br />

1293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!