28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

to or in connection with particular contents of thoughts and thinkings, i.e., mind, aroused in the
particular contexts. Shimcheong is likely to be touched and aroused in close, mutually committed
interpersonal relationships. Shimcheong, therefore, does matter between persons in Cheong (long
standing, mutually self-committed, mind to mind relationship) relationship. In Cheong
relationship, individuality disappears and social standards of behavior such as justice, impartiality,
lawfulness, objectivity and rationality and so forth are overridden by or reinterpreted in
accordance with the alternative standards of behaviors canonical in Cheong relationships. The
psycho-logic of Shimcheong in the same vain follows that of Cheong which is markedly different
from the set of logics prescribed by social morality and justice. In Korea, the two types of thinking
and justice, i.e., private type of Shimcheong psycho-logics and public type of social-normative
psycho-logics are co-existent together in delicate harmony and tension, having their own
respective niches and functional values in Koreans' social and personal life spaces. Finally,
the-first-person psychology and the-third-person psychology will be discussed in relation to the
two types of psycho-logics.
1036 INVITED SYMPOSIUM
International Research Collaborations
Convener and Chair: G. Hatano, Japan
Co-convener: R. Gelman, USA
1036.1 Barriers, bridges, and benefits of international collaboration, K. Deaux, The City
University of New York, New York, NY, USA
International research collaboration can be discussed in concrete and strategic terms, as a
compendium of what to do and what not to do in order to increase the likelihood of a successful
project. Collaboration can also be discussed in more conceptual or functional terms, in terms of
why we want to collaborate and what we are likely to gain. As a social psychologist in a field that
has often assumed universality for locally-assessed phenomena, I will argue that international
collaboration is not only desirable but is in fact essential for the progressive development of our
knowledge base.
1036.2 Learning in a world of scholars, J.B. Overmier, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN, USA
Around the globe, insightful scholars are researching important questions on psychology of
learning with new approaches and new methods. An American hegemony--if it ever really
existed--is over, and they need to be in contact with the innovative and exciting research that is
being done in other regions of the world through visits and exchanges. Barriers take the form of
locating opportunities, research regulations, funding, visas, timing, and cultural styles, among
others. The effects of even 'minor' barriers in stifling exchanges should not be underestimated. But
neither should the benefits be mis-estimated. Continuing collaborations can have significant joint
benefits.
1036.3 What makes a collaboration work? A.D. Baddeley, University of York, York, UK
79