09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

actually share common mechanisms. A theory was provided to account for PFI and MIB in<br />

particular and perceptual fading phenomena in general. In this theory, perceptual grouping,<br />

figure-ground segregation, boundary adaptation, surface formation and surface competition each<br />

play different roles in perceptual fading.<br />

1039.6 Inhibition <strong>of</strong> return persists longer on repeated locations, H.F. Chao, Y.Y. Yeh, National<br />

Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, China<br />

It takes longer time for people to revisit recently examined locations. This effect is named<br />

inhibition <strong>of</strong> return. In this study, a simple dot-detection task was used. The dot was presented in<br />

one cell <strong>of</strong> an invisible 15X15 matrix. Experiment 1 showed that inhibition <strong>of</strong> return could be<br />

found on locations that were repeatedly used in one experimental session, but not on locations that<br />

were used only once. By varying cue-to-probe stimulus onset asynchrony, Experiment 2 indicated<br />

that inhibition <strong>of</strong> return persisted longer on repeated locations. The role <strong>of</strong> memory in inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />

return was discussed.<br />

1040 INVITED SYMPOSIUM<br />

Frontiers in prospective memory research<br />

Convener and Chair: P. Graf, Canada<br />

1040.1 Metamemory for prospective and retrospective memory tasks, L. Kvavilashvili, K.<br />

Taylor, University <strong>of</strong> Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK<br />

In this paper the possible relationship between prospective and retrospective memory will be<br />

assessed by examining the accuracy <strong>of</strong> metamemory predictions <strong>of</strong> one's performance in<br />

prospective and retrospective memory tasks. The results show that while young children were very<br />

accurate in predicting whether they would remember to do something later on in the experiment (a<br />

prospective memory task) they were considerably overestimating their performance in a task <strong>of</strong><br />

free recall <strong>of</strong> pictures (a retrospective memory task). This finding speaks in favour <strong>of</strong> early<br />

development <strong>of</strong> metamemory awareness for prospective memory tasks in comparison to<br />

retrospective memory and is indicative <strong>of</strong> possible dissociations in underlying mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

these two forms <strong>of</strong> memory.<br />

1040.2 Age-related changes in event-cued prospective memory, B. Uttl, University <strong>of</strong> Tsukuba,<br />

Tsukuba City, Japan<br />

Age-related changes in visual and auditory event-cued prospective memory (ProM) were<br />

examined. To assess visual ProM, participants were shown a series <strong>of</strong> pictures, with one defined as<br />

the ProM cue, while simultaneously making A/B decisions. Similarly, to assess auditory ProM,<br />

participants were played various sounds, with one defined as the ProM cue. Cue display size and<br />

cue loudness were increased gradually across trials until participants responded, such that cue size<br />

and loudness served as an effective index <strong>of</strong> ProM. Both visual and auditory ProM declined with<br />

age due to changes in peripheral as well as central processing.<br />

1040.3 Mechanisms underlying importance effects in prospective remembering, M. Kliegel,<br />

Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland<br />

Only a few studies have experimentally examined the influence <strong>of</strong> perceived task importance on<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!