09.02.2013 Views

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

28th International Congress of Psychology August 8 ... - U-netSURF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

validity. We present results on temporal-order judgment showing group differences in performance<br />

(men vs. women, young vs. elderly person, aphasics vs. controls) that depend on the stimulation<br />

parameters and the reliability <strong>of</strong> the method. The association <strong>of</strong> temporal-processing and phoneme<br />

discrimination in patients with aphasia varies depending on the assessment method employed.<br />

2004.4 The time course <strong>of</strong> inhibition <strong>of</strong> return for target discriminations and aging effects, Y.<br />

Bao 1 , L.T. Fu 1 , J.Z. Zhou 2 , 1 Peking University, Beijing, China; 2 Beijing Normal University,<br />

Beijing, China<br />

Inhibition <strong>of</strong> return (IOR) refers to a slowed response time for targets appearing at a previously<br />

cued location. The present study examined the age-related differences on the time course <strong>of</strong> IOR<br />

with a discrimination task in 48 young and elderly adults. Intervals between peripheral cues and<br />

targets were systematically varied from 400 ms to 2100 ms with a typical double cue procedure.<br />

Results show that elderly adults exhibit both a later onset and an earlier <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>of</strong> IOR as compared<br />

to young adults. Possible reasons underlying the different time course <strong>of</strong> IOR for the two age<br />

groups were discussed.<br />

2004.5 Temporal information processing in cognitive processes, E. Szelag 1 , K. Magdalena 1 , K.<br />

Iwona 1 , K. Joanna 1 , S. Joanna 2 , 1 Nenchi Institute <strong>of</strong> Experimental Biology, Poland; 2 Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Physiology and Pathology <strong>of</strong> Hearing, Warsaw, Poland<br />

Neuropsychological evidence suggests an association between temporal information processing<br />

(TIP) and cognition. At least three different ranges <strong>of</strong> around 30, 300 and 3000 milliseconds seem<br />

to be crucial for human behaviour, including language functions. In a series <strong>of</strong> experiments we<br />

studied TIP on the above time domains in young healthy volunteers, elderly people, centenarians<br />

and subjects with language disorders <strong>of</strong> different etiologies: congenital deafness, cochlear<br />

implantation, autism, aphasia. We found associations between atypical TIP and chronological<br />

ageing or language deficits. We conclude that in many cognitive processes timing is <strong>of</strong> an essence.<br />

2005 INVITED SYMPOSIUM<br />

Recent developments in working memory<br />

Convener and Chair: A. Baddeley, UK<br />

2005.1 Child development as a portal to working memory processes, N. Cowan, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA<br />

This talk will focus on two questions about the development <strong>of</strong> working memory: why it is worth<br />

studying and what methods might help in studying it. Basically, it is worth studying because the<br />

history <strong>of</strong> the child’s working memory helps to explain the processes <strong>of</strong> the adult mind, much as<br />

the history <strong>of</strong> a nation helps to explain its present political form. When studying a theoretical<br />

concept such as working memory and trying to pinpoint its mental mechanisms, one must be<br />

particularly concerned with psychological measurement issues. Some methodological suggestions<br />

will be <strong>of</strong>fered with respect to two basic parameters <strong>of</strong> working memory: its speed and its<br />

capacity.<br />

2005.2 Individual differences in working memory: What do working memory span tasks really<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!