Mayor información... - Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo ...

EJE TEMÁTICO I RELACIONES ENTRE CONOCIMIENTO PREVIO DEL TEMA Y COMPRENSIÓN DE MúLTIPLES TEXTOS EXPOSITIVOS
bIbLIOgRAfÍA
Britt, M. A. & Sommer, j. (2004). facilitating textual integration with macrostructure focusing tasks.
Reading Psychology, 25, 313-339.
Cerdán, R. & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple
documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 209-222.
Coté, N., goldman, S. r. & Saul, E. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: relations
between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 1-53.
Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E. & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). Summary versus argument tasks when
working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom? Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 35, 157-173.
goldman, S. r. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts.
En Shuart-Faris, N. & Bloome, D. (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational
research (pp. 313-347). hillsdale, Nj: Erlbaum.
Graesser, A. C., León, J. A. & Otero, J. (2002). Introduction to the psychology of science text
comprehension. En Otero, J., León, J.A. & Graesser J.A. (Eds.), The psychology of science
text comprehension (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, N.j.: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Kobayashi, K. (2009). The influence of topic knowledge, external strategy use, and college
experience on students’ comprehension of controversial texts. Learning and Individual
Differences, 19, 130–134.
Le Bigot, L. & Rouet, J.-F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior
knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy
Research, 39(4), 445-470.
McNamara, D. S. (2001). reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text
sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 51-62.
McNamara, D. S. & O’reilly, T. (2010). Theories of comprehension and comprehension skill:
Knowledge and strategies versus capacity and suppression. En Columbus, A. M. (Ed.),
Advances in Psychology Research (vol. 62, pp. 113-136). hauppauge, Ny: Nova Science
Publishers.
Ozuru, y., Best, r., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A. & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format
and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and
Instruction, 25(4), 399-438.
30 INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AUTÓNOMO DE MÉXICO, MÉXICO, D.F.