30.05.2016 Views

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

Dylan Evans further explains, “Moebius strip is one of the figures studied by Lacan in his use of<br />

topology. It is the three‐dimensional figure that can be formed by taking a long rectangle of<br />

paper and twisting it once before joining its ends together. The result is a figure which subverts<br />

our normal (Euclidian) way of representing space, for it seems to have two sides but in fact has<br />

only one (and only one edge). Locally, at any point, two sides can be clearly distinguished, but<br />

when the whole strip is traversed it becomes clear that they are in fact continuous. The two sides<br />

are only distinguished by the dimension of time, the time it takes to traverse the whole strip”<br />

(116).<br />

6<br />

Evans, An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis, 116.<br />

7<br />

Slavoj Žižek, “In His Bold Gaze My Ruin Is Writ Large,” in Everything you always wanted to know<br />

about Lacan (but were afraid to ask Hitchcock), ed. Slavoj Žižek. (New York: Verso, 1992), 227.<br />

Bibliography<br />

Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London: New York:<br />

Routledge, 1997.<br />

Karamustafa, Gülsün. Memory of a Square (perceived from an interior), 2005.<br />

Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1956‐60.<br />

Edited by Jacques‐Alain Miller. Translated by Dennis Porter. London: W.W. Norton & Co., 1992.<br />

Žižek, Slavoj. “In His Bold Gaze My Ruin Is Writ Large.” In Everything you always wanted to know<br />

about Lacan (but were afraid to ask Hitchcock), edited by Slavoj Žižek, 211‐272. New York: Verso,<br />

1992.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!