30.05.2016 Views

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

narrative (Brontë, 2006: 289).Thornhill is also the landscape of a particular kind of sexual trauma for<br />

Jane, since it is the seat of Rochester’s power, and its ruin at the end of the narrative, is a Freudian<br />

wish‐fulfillment for Jane. Jane’s bildung or self‐evolution is carefully positioned against the death,<br />

ruin and decay of others that work to consolidate her position and we could note that Thornhill’s ruin<br />

coincides with Jane gaining economic competency.<br />

The red‐room episode that has fascinated readers and critics endlessly is a violent landscape that<br />

mirrors Jane’s surreal paintings that impress Rochester so well. The red‐room is more a place of<br />

traumatic memory than a physical landscape, even though its physical characteristics are<br />

painstakingly documented. Jane says about the red‐room, “it was chill, it was solemn, it was silent,”<br />

thus passing the dread very effectively to the reader. The Gothic elements of death, decay and<br />

mystery are all present in this scene. But the red‐room and the Reeds who commanded it have all<br />

been attenuated by the end of the narrative, and Jane is left with her love, strong and self‐possessed.<br />

The memory‐place that was a site of stasis, hindering Jane, the subject, vanishes, leaving her fully<br />

healed—thus making it possible for the reader to see how the landscape of the past can absorb<br />

trauma and heal the psyche, working as a therapeutic and redemptive force.<br />

The reader’s trauma: bearing testimony<br />

Characters, nature, events, all are constructed with a blinding intensity in order to effect<br />

maximum secondary trauma on the reader who must bear the testimony.16 For example in the<br />

scene, where Jane and Helen leave after spending a pleasant evening in Miss Temple’s room, the<br />

narrator says, with heightened sentiment: “Helen she held a little longer than me; she let her go<br />

more reluctantly. It was Helen her eye followed to the door; it was for her she a second time<br />

breathed a sad sigh; for her she wiped a tear from her cheek” (Brontë, 2006: 87). Here, the overload<br />

of affect threatens to ruin the narration, yet, the reader knows at a subconscious level, that Helen is<br />

about to die soon, and so is unable to be critical of the overtly maudlin language. Freud’s caution in<br />

Studies in Hysteria that when the reaction to trauma is suppressed the affect remains united with the<br />

memory can be comprehended in this very episode. For the reader, the narrator’s memories become<br />

sub‐texts and inter‐texts; the haunting is then, a rewriting. This is the performative aspect of trauma<br />

that interests Felman. “I will suggest—in line—with what has recently been claimed by feminist<br />

psychiatrists and psychotherapists—that every woman’s life contains, explicitly or in implicit ways,<br />

the story of a trauma”, writes Felman in her book What does a Woman Want?, where she explores<br />

the desire to tell the story by the female subject, which results in an alteration in the female listener<br />

(Felman, 1993:16). In an earlier book, working with clinical psychiatrist Dori Laub, Felman had<br />

studied the power of the listener/witness on fragmented testimony, and how the testimony is made<br />

whole again because of the sympathy of the listener/witness. Jane, the narrator, is a self‐conscious<br />

performer, apostrophizing the readers periodically, and thus creating a rupture in the telling.17<br />

Yet, for Jane, the subject, for whom self‐effacement is a vital strategy, all performance is shallow;<br />

this is but a natural corollary to her dislike of self‐display. Both Céline Varens and her daughter Adèle<br />

are shown in poor light—frivolous, superficial, and greedy for material things, and eager to perform<br />

for others. Although our knowledge of Céline comes from Rochester’s narration, it is still filtered<br />

through Jane’s perspective. Blanche, when taking part in the game of charades where she is the star<br />

performer, becomes, in Jane’s words, “showy but not genuine”. She says in the same paragraph,<br />

“Miss Ingram was a mark beneath my jealousy: she was too inferior to excite the feeling” (Brontë,<br />

2006: 215). Curiously Jane does not feel contempt for Rochester for his performing tendencies; the<br />

reader learns that he has a great baritone, and he participates in the charades as well. Thus Jane’s<br />

subjective opinions are formed around the idea of gender, with the female seemingly more<br />

problematic for her sense of identity. Earlier in the narrative, Adèle sings a song to impress her new<br />

tutor, which in Jane’s opinion, is clearly unsuitable for a child, and “in very bad taste”( Brontë, 2006:<br />

121). In the scene when Rochester narrates his dark history about the French performer Céline, for<br />

whom he had nursed a “grande passion,” and who had later treacherously betrayed him, nativism<br />

collides with a bitter contempt for frivolity, and Jane, the narrator, derives great satisfaction in<br />

relating all the unsavory details (Brontë, 2006: 165). This is the revenge of the repressed, even

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!