30.05.2016 Views

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36<br />

Ibid., 83.<br />

37<br />

Virginia Woolf, Three Guineas (London: Penguin, 1977): 162.<br />

38<br />

Gerda Lerner defines "feminist consciousness" as: “[T]he awareness of women that they belong to a<br />

subordinate group; that they have suffered wrongs as a group; that their condition of subordination is<br />

not natural, but is societally determined; that they must join with other women to remedy these<br />

wrongs; and finally, that they must and can provide an alternate vision of societal organization in which<br />

women as well as men will enjoy autonomy and self‐determination.” Gerda Lerner, The Creation of<br />

Patriarchy. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): 14.<br />

39 Through her work at Wellhouse, I am improvising with long‐held mythological notions of Mary:<br />

“She listens to the implorations of mankind, ‘groaning and weeping in this valley of tears’—as the<br />

Salve Regina sings—and promises to ease their pain with heavenly medicine….Her love of<br />

mankind is maternal, and her qualities of mercy, gentleness, loving kindness, indulgence,<br />

forgiveness, are all seen as motherly. All men are her children through Christ her son…and so she<br />

lavishes a mother’s love and pity on all her brood.” Warner, Alone of All Her Sex, 285‐286. As<br />

likely befitting the role of motherhood in Christ’s time, I extended these maternal qualities to the<br />

son, so that Jesus becomes his mother’s son, “such a nice boy.” Sobat, The Book of Mary, 237.<br />

40<br />

Sobat, The Book of Mary, 98.<br />

41<br />

Lerner points out: “a man’s social class was the result of the relationship to the means of production,<br />

whereas, a woman’s social class depended on [her] ties to a man who gave [her] access to material<br />

resources.” Lerner, The Creation of Patriarchy, 215. Basak Dörschel elaborates: “Moreover, as women<br />

were denied any rights, they could not escape patriarchy. Lerner notes that they could leave their<br />

father’s house only to go to live under their husband’s hegemony. Furthermore, women who have<br />

refused such patriarchal codes have always been marginalized in history. These independent women<br />

were considered ‘not respectable’. This respectable/not respectable categorization of woman by<br />

patriarchy, Lerner declares, also functions as another means of oppression on women.” BaŞak Dörchel,<br />

“Female Identity,” 39. According to Lerner, “[men] punish by ridicule, exclusion, or ostracism, any<br />

woman who assumes the right to interpret her own role‐ or worst of sins‐ the right to rewrite the<br />

script.” Lerner, The Creation of Patriarchy, 13.<br />

42 In creating the twelve women of Wellhouse and the character of Anna/Andrew, I sought to<br />

include different castes, races and orientations of women other than Mary who is a privileged,<br />

fairly affluent Jewess, in an attempt to stress “the multiplicity of differences that nuance<br />

women’s lived experiences, social and political activism, or literary and historical<br />

representations.” Antoinette Burton, “‘History’ is Now: feminist theory and the production of<br />

historical feminisms.” Women’s History Review 1, No. 1 (1992): 32. I am well aware that there is<br />

no such concept of a “unified ‘feminist past.’” Ibid., 32. The sisterhood of the Eastern Star is not<br />

meant as a “cheerful narrative”; indeed, the sisters are meant to represent the women who are<br />

marginalized – those of the distant past, and certainly, those of the late 20 th and 21 st centuries.<br />

Ibid.,33. Neither are Mary and the relationship with her sisters meant to be cast as essentialist.<br />

True, they are bound by the gender roles of early 1 st ‐century Nazarene women, but they are not<br />

above divisiveness and difficulty in co‐existing as a group of healers. My portrayal of these<br />

women disciples was intended as “a challenge to the universality of women’s condition and a<br />

constant reminder of the many differences amongst women.” Maria Tamboukou, “Narratives<br />

from within: an Arendtian approach to life histories and the writing of history,” Journal of<br />

Educational Administration and History 42, No. 2 (May 2010): 129.<br />

43<br />

Sobat, The Book of Mary, 148.<br />

44<br />

Katherine Anne Tucker. “Abominations of the Female Sex: Five Case Studies of Late Nineteenth<br />

Century Criminal Women,” (Lancashire: University of Central Lancashire, 2013): 47.<br />

45<br />

“’To step outside of patriarchal thought’… means developing intellectual courage, the courage<br />

to stand alone, the courage to reach farther than our grasp, the courage to risk failure. Perhaps<br />

the greatest challenge to thinking women is the challenge to move from the desire for safety and<br />

approval to the most ‘unfeminine’ quality of all‐ that of intellectual arrogance and the supreme<br />

hubris which asserts to itself the right to reorder the world. The hubris of godmakers, the hubris<br />

of the male system builders.” Lerner, The Creation of Patriarchy, 228.<br />

46<br />

Sobat, The Book of Mary, 241.<br />

47<br />

Warner, Alone of All Her Sex, 208. Mary’s assumption was said to have taken place in Ephesus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!