30.05.2016 Views

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

sempozyum_bildiri_kitabi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Women’s petitions and telegrams to demand justice<br />

Ottoman women’s wartime petitions and their telegrams which were sent to state bureaucracy<br />

are full of detailed information about their everyday life experience and various forms of violence<br />

they suffered. These sources reveal that women were especially exposed to maltreatment. For<br />

example, women who demanded food relief, pensions or housing were in a vulnerable situation that<br />

made them prone to violent behavior of angry or corrupt bureaucrats. Likewise the petitions and<br />

telegrams show that those peasant women who resisted illegal actions by tax collectors or soldiers<br />

were frequently attacked. Such kind of incidents usually happened during the implementation of<br />

wartime mobilization measures such as forced labor and high wartime agricultural taxes.<br />

Ordinary women as wives, sisters or mothers of Ottoman soldiers had serious problems in<br />

receiving special pensions assigned to the soldiers’ families without a breadwinner. They often<br />

demanded the payment of their pension in due time or in correct amount and complained about the<br />

late payments, low amounts or bureaucratic red tape, which made them prone to verbal or physical<br />

violence. Usually red tape went hand in hand with the bad treatment by the Ottoman civil servants of<br />

the women who sought help. For instance, a telegram sent from the Şevketiye village of Andırın, a<br />

town of Maraş, by Fatma and her friend, informed the government that they had been treated badly<br />

by civil servants. To legitimize their position, they started their telegram with patriotic words,<br />

declaring that they were “the families of soldiers who spilled their blood for the sake of the<br />

protection of the fatherland.” After this partly true and partly rhetorical introduction, the women<br />

complained that their pension certificates had been rejected unlawfully by the aggressive<br />

bureaucrats. 5<br />

Similarly, seven women living in İznik named Halime, Ümmühan, Ayşe, Emine Dudu, Fıtnat, Emine<br />

and Şerife sent a telegram to both the İzmit governorship and the Ministry of Internal Affairs on 15<br />

November 1917. They demanded their unpaid pensions and complained about the rude behavior of<br />

the district governor toward them when they had asked him why their pensions had not been<br />

distributed. They argued that their husbands had been in the army for the last three years and that<br />

many women like them had great difficulties receiving their pensions.<br />

According to their telegram, although they had applied to the İznik district governor who was also<br />

the chairman of the İznik Commission for Soldiers Families without a Breadwinner (İznik Muinsizler<br />

Komisyonu), he had not taken their demands into consideration. He had shirked his duty by driving<br />

them out with offensive words and using violence against them. These women protested this<br />

treatment, again employing a patriotic discourse and claiming that while their husbands had been<br />

sacrificing their lives for the protection of the fatherland, they had not deserved this poverty and<br />

such bad treatment by the state officials. They also demanded that their pensions be regularly paid.<br />

Upon the complaints of these women, the Ministry of Internal Affairs started an investigation.<br />

Against these accusations, the district governor first answered that these women were very probably<br />

rich enough and therefore they had not been given pensions. However, at the end of the<br />

investigations, it was understood that the problem stemmed from the disorganization of the record<br />

books in which the names of pension receivers were written. Only after the women were identified<br />

they began receiving their pensions again. 6<br />

Low‐income women who demanded food from the state or who tried to save their scarce<br />

agricultural crops from tax collectors during the hard years of the war were also exposed to violence.<br />

For instance, in a telegram sent from Beypazarı on 18 November 1916 a group of women complained<br />

of hunger due to the drought. It was signed by Hatice “on behalf of all soldiers’ wives” and her<br />

friends who also signed their telegram referring their connection with a soldier as “soldier’s wife”<br />

Zihniyye, “soldier’s son” Nuri and “martyrs’ daughter” Ümmühan. These women and children started<br />

their telegram by reminding the authorities that their husbands and fathers had left them to the<br />

protection of the state to do their military service. Due to the drought that year the price of the grain<br />

had escalated, and as a result, they had gone hungry. They argued as well that the local government<br />

which had previously announced that it would provide seed and provisions to the needy peasants

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!