16.12.2012 Aufrufe

Psychische Erkrankungen in der Lebensspanne ... - DGPPN

Psychische Erkrankungen in der Lebensspanne ... - DGPPN

Psychische Erkrankungen in der Lebensspanne ... - DGPPN

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Topic 15 G Pharmakotherapie // Pharmacotherapy<br />

outcome can be predicted at an early stage by determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the degree<br />

of HPA axis normalization <strong>in</strong> a second dex / CRH test. In a recent<br />

genome-wide association study, we identified a set of genetic<br />

polymorphisms associated with antidepressant treatment outcome.<br />

Patients with favorable genetic background showed a high rate of remission<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependently from HPA axis normaliza tion, while patients<br />

with an unfavorable genetic background showed the worst<br />

treatment outcome <strong>in</strong> case of a persistent dysregulation of the HPA<br />

axis.<br />

003<br />

Algorithm-based decisions <strong>in</strong> antidepressant treatment – which<br />

patients need stepped care treatment approaches?<br />

Mazda Adli (Charité Campus Mitte, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie,<br />

Berl<strong>in</strong>)<br />

Medication algorithms have been proposed as effective means to<br />

offer optimal treatment and improved outcome for patients with<br />

severe mental illness. The randomized controlled phases GAP 2<br />

and GAP 3 demonstrated that an SSTR leads to shorter times to<br />

remission as well as improved treatment performance. GAP3 was a<br />

multicenter randomized cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial compar<strong>in</strong>g two different<br />

treatment algorithms (I: SSTR, II: computerized documentation<br />

and expert system, CDES) with treatment as usual (TAU) with<strong>in</strong><br />

the German Research Network on Depression. 429 participants of<br />

GAP3 were studied with regard to overall outcomes at hospital discharge<br />

after acute treatment of the <strong>in</strong>dex episode. Remission was<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed as a Hamilton-Depression Rat<strong>in</strong>g Score (HAMD-21)≤9.<br />

Independent from duration of study participation SSTR more likely<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> remission at discharge than CDES or TAU (OR = 2,641;<br />

p = .003). Cl<strong>in</strong>ical subtyp<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>teraction analysis showed that<br />

patients with anxious and melancholic subtypes but not psychotic<br />

subtype of depression required significantly longer treatments to<br />

achieve remission but benefited from SSTR irrespective from cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

phenotype or other sociodemographic variables. Patients with<br />

recurrent depression showed a significantly higher probability of<br />

comply<strong>in</strong>g with SSTR than first or s<strong>in</strong>gle episode patients. With regard<br />

to biomarker-based subtyp<strong>in</strong>g GSK3beta genotyp<strong>in</strong>g revealed<br />

that carriers of the c-allele (C/C, C/T) who had not sufficiently responded<br />

to antidepressant monotherapy <strong>in</strong> step 1 showed a significantly<br />

higher probability of achiev<strong>in</strong>g remission after subsequent<br />

lithium augmentation than homozygous carriers of the T-allele<br />

(T/T) (HR: 2.70, p=.007). In conclusion, <strong>in</strong>patients suffer<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

major depression benefit from algorithm-guided treatment follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

an SSTR <strong>in</strong>dependently from age, gen<strong>der</strong> or number of previous<br />

depressive episodes. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical subtype <strong>in</strong>fluences the time<br />

need ed to achieve remission or compliance with treatment, but not<br />

responsiveness to the application of SSTR. A genotype-based personalized<br />

approach might be useful to determ<strong>in</strong>e the sequence of<br />

treatment steps after an <strong>in</strong>itial antidepressant monotherapy has<br />

failed.<br />

004<br />

Rationale and design of the „Randomised cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

early medication change (EMC) strategy with treatment as usual<br />

(TAU) <strong>in</strong> patients with Major Depressive Disor<strong>der</strong> – the EMC trial“<br />

Andre Tadic (Universitätsmediz<strong>in</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong>z, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie)<br />

S. Gorbulev, N. Dahmen, C. Hiemke, D. F. Braus, J. Röschke, D. van<br />

Calker, D. Wachtl<strong>in</strong>, K. Lieb<br />

Introduction: In Major Depressive Disor<strong>der</strong> (MDD), treatment<br />

outcomes with currently available antidepressants and treatment<br />

strategies are <strong>in</strong>sufficient. Reflect<strong>in</strong>g the traditional belief of a delayed<br />

onset of antidepressants‘ effects, current guidel<strong>in</strong>es usually<br />

recommend treatment duration of 3 – 8 weeks until optimisation <strong>in</strong><br />

case of <strong>in</strong>sufficient outcome. Challeng<strong>in</strong>g this concept, many retro-<br />

spective studies showed that improvement occurs usually with<strong>in</strong><br />

the first 10 – 14 days of treatment (=early improvement) and that<br />

such improvement (17-item Hamilton Rat<strong>in</strong>g Depression Scale<br />

[HAMD-17] decrease ≥20 %) <strong>in</strong> the early course of treatment has a<br />

substantial predictive value for the f<strong>in</strong>al outcome. Most importantly,<br />

non-improvement (HAMD-17 decrease

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!