Bericht - Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend

Eight countries (Austria, Liechtenstein, Germany, Iceland, UK, Sweden, Denmark, Portugal) provide a
rate of women’s shelter places of 0.93 – 0.59 places per 10,000 inhabitants. In these countries there
is one women’s shelter place available for 10,700 to 16,800 inhabitants. Thus these countries fulfill at
least half of the standard.
18 countries (Belgium, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Estonia, Macedonia, Switzerland, Ireland, Albania,
Montenegro, Turkey, France, Greece, Cyprus, Georgia, Serbia, Romania, Croatia, Slovakia, Armenia)
have a rate of women’s shelter places of 0.45 to 0.1 and the service provision is very poor – there is
only one women’s shelter place available for 22,400 to 96,900 inhabitants. It is surprising, and concerning
that even a country like Switzerland, one of the richest in the world, provides a very low
number of women’s shelter places (one place per 29,000 inhabitants). Also the situation in France is
concerning, where one women’s shelter place has to cover over 55,000 inhabitants.
The service provision is extremely poor in the next group of eight countries (Italy, Bulgaria, Azerbaijan,
Czech Republic, Finland, Ukraine, Russia and Poland). The women’s shelter places rate in these
countries lies between 0.09 and 0.006 places. This means that in Italy for instance, there is only one
women’s shelter place for over 110,000 inhabitants.
In Poland, the most ill-equipped country in this group, one women’s shelter place serves almost 1.5
million people.
It has to be noted, that this numbers only show a trend, but cannot give a picture about the quality
of services. It is known, for instance, that Finland provides family shelters in good quality; but since
they are not services specifically for women survivors of violence they were not listed in the report.
Four countries (Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus) do not seem to have any service that would qualify
as a women specific shelter. This situation of course causes considerable concern.
Further information: Rosa Logar e-mail: rosa.logar@interventionsstelle-wien.at.
Tabelle 46: Psychotherapeutenkammern mit den aktuellsten Daten differenziert nach Bundesländern
An vertragspsychotherapeutischer
Versorgung teilnehmend 2)
Bundesland PP* Davon Davon Doppel-
gesamt KJP** approbierte 3)
PP KJP
Baden-Württemberg 3361 746 376 1552 585
Bayern 4213 844 259 1989 523
Berlin 2932 493 102 1459 211
Brandenburg 445 79 0 188 53
Bremen 396 70 23 257 55
Hamburg 1198 162 157 647 136
Hessen 2404 506 217 1453 337
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 270 46 0 107 24
Niedersachsen 2138 634 177 1078 387
Nordrhein-Westfalen 5657 1481 677 3056 688
Rheinland-Pfalz 1192 182 138 478 158
Saarland 348 69 24 155 39
Sachsen 908 129 0 573 126
Sachsen-Anhalt 306 48 0 208 35
Schleswig-Holstein 853 175 67 382 87
Thüringen 349 81 0 219 63
Gesamt
1)
Quelle: BPtK; Stichtag:31.12.2010
26970 5745 2217 13801 3507
2) Quelle: KBV; Stichtag:31.12.2010
3) Approbation als PP und KJP
* Psychologische/r Psychotherapeut/in
** Kinder- und Jugendpsychotherapeut/in
Approbation 1)
354