dinamica social libro

Notas 211
Occupational Preference and Effort: A Theoretical,
Methodological and Empirical Appraisal”, Psychological Bulletin,
noviembre de 1974, pp. 1053-1077; y W. Van Eerde y H. Thierry,
“Vroom’s Expectancy Models and Work-Related Criteria: A
Meta-analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, octubre de 1996, pp.
575-586. Para más apoyo, ver L. W. Porter y E. E. Lawler III,
Managerial Attitudes and Performance (Homewood, IL: Irwin,
1968); y J. J. Donovan, “Work Motivation”, en N. Anderson et al
(eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology,
vol. 2 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001), pp. 56-59.
75. Vroom se refiere a esas tres variables como espectativa, instrumentalidad
y valencia, respectivamente.
76. J. Nocera, “The Anguish of Being an Analyst”, New York Times, 4
de marzo de 2006, pp. B1, B12.
77. P. M. Muchinsky, “A Comparison of Within- and Across- Subjects
Analyses of the Expectancy-Valence Model for Predicting
Effort”, Academy of Management Journal, marzo de 1977, pp. 154-
158; y C. W. Kennedy, J. A. Fossum, y B. J. White, “An Empirical
Comparison of Within-Subjects and Between-Subjects
Expectancy Theory Models”, Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Process, agosto de 1983, pp. 124-143.
78. R. J. House, H. J. Shapiro, y M. A. Wahba, “Expectancy Theory
as a Predictor of Work Behavior and Attitudes: A Re–evaluation
of Empirical Evidence”, Decision Sciences, enero de 1974, pp. 481-
506.
79. Para otros ejemplos de modelos que buscan integrar las teorías
de la motivación, ver H. J. Klein, “An Integrated Control Theory
Model of Work Motivation”, Academy of Management Review, abril
de 1989, pp. 150-172; E. A. Locke, “The Motivation Sequence,
the Motivation Hub, and the Motivation Core”, Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, diciembre de 1991, pp.
288-299; y T. R. Mitchell, “Matching Motivational Strategies with
Organizational Contexts”, pp. 60-62.
80. N. J. Adler, International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior,
4a ed. (Cincinnati, OH: South–Western Publishing, 2002),
p. 174.
81. G. Hofstede, “Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do
American Theories Apply Abroad?” Organizational Dynamics,
verano de 1980, p. 55.
82. Ibid.
83. J. K. Giacobbe-Miller, D. J. Miller, y V. I. Victorov, “A Com pa -
rison of Russian and U.S. Pay Allocation Decisions, Distributive
Justice Judgments, and Productivity Under Different Payment
Conditions”, Personnel Psychology, primavera de 1998, pp. 137-
163.
84. S. L. Mueller y L. D. Clarke, “Political-Economic Context and
Sensitivity to Equity: Differences Between the United States and
the Transition Economies of Central and Eastern Europe”,
Academy of Management Journal, junio de 1998, pp. 319-329.
85. I. Harpaz, “The Importance of Work Goals: An International
Perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies, First
Quarter 1990, pp. 75-93.
86. G. E. Popp, H. J. Davis, y T. T. Herbert, “An International Study
of Intrinsic Motivation Composition”, Management International
Review, enero de 1986, pp. 28-35.
87. Esta sección se basa en F. J. Landy y W. S. Becker, “Motivation
Theory Reconsidered”, en L. L. Cummings y B. M. Staw (eds.),
Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 9 (Greenwich, CT: JAI
Press, 1987), pp. 24-35.
88. J. Zaslow, “Losing Well: How a Successful Man Deal with a Rare
and Public Failure”, Wall Street Journal, 2 de marzo de 2006, p.
D1.
89. E. Biyalogorsky, W. Boulding, y R. Staelin, “Stuck in the Past:
Why Managers Persist with New Product Failures”, Journal of
Marketing, abril de 2006, pp. 108-121.