In libros Aristotelis de caelo paraphrasis hebraice et latine

P R A E V A T IPsellum riatoiiiciim, quern scimus versus politicos pepigisse, uon sineprobabilitate [)roi)tei- scntentias Platonicas referri possunt^).riurimum valere etiam aliud argumentum iam in scliedis suis optimclloelkius exposuit. interdum Michael difficiliorcs quasdara Aristotelisvoces facilioribus suis illustrat, i)araplirasta autem, cum verbo tenusAristotelem transscribat, pro difficilioribus illis vocabulis tritiora ^lichaelisponit") vel iuxta ponit Aristotelica et Michaelis interpretamenta tamquamdiversa. velut Arist. p. 449"^ 13 scribit oots tou rapovTO^ (so. est memoria),dl}' ai'a(>r^!3'.c, Mich. p. G,2G iiiterpretatur ssxi 8s o-jte to [xiXXov u.vr|U.ov£UTovo'j-3 TO ivsaTto;- -ouTO 7ap sTtto Trapov, Soph. p. 1,14 iu textu Aristotelicostatim Michaelis paraphrasim substituit: outs to IvsaTtoc, addit all' eaxivahy}r^ai; to-j TiapovTOs. eandem rationem aliis locis Hoelkius observavit ').Arist. p. 449'' IS irUa-.aadon , Mich. p. 7,9 suiaTcxcOai Xs^oi av to ek i^t-GTYJtxr^v aY£(5i)ai, Soph. p. 1,20 u-avOa'veiv xai ei? iTcitjTrj[jir/^ a^saiOai. — Arist.p. 450^7 oux evol/£T«t vosiv ouosv ave-j awzyouz ouo' aveu "/povou -ri [xt] sv/povtp ovTct, Mich. p. 11,21 ss. [x>] h XP^^^P ^^T-^ TravTct Ta at'Sict, et aveuypovo'j atque otvcu a'jvs/otj; idem valere putat, Soph, iungens lemma etinterpretameiitum duo membra quasi diversa efficit p. 3,30. 31 v.cn ccj-yj f|aiTi'a Toy u7] £vo£/oai}ai vosTv avsu auvs/oG? Ta dioia |j.rjo' avsu /povou Ta [j.t]£v -/po'Ao 0VT7.. — Arist. p. 450*18 iWc o' ouosvl TU}v ilv/jTojv, quod lemmaexpiicat Mich. p. 13,11 icoj,- o£ ouosvl twv aXo^tov, Soph. p. 4,7 hoc solumpouit. — Mich. p. 13,27 -a&o? Xs^si tov tuttov X7.l to i'(-/.