09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

|1/6/05 07:02:08 AM|max hord|fernandina bch,fla||mhord@smurfit.com||||10|O.K.<br />

you Liston fans.I know Sonny was a bad dude but how many times did you see him<br />

come back after losing the edge in a fight?Think about Ali and even Leotis<br />

Martin.|<br />

|1/6/05 07:10:21 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|Patterson couldn't<br />

find time to fight Cleve Willilams, Eddie Machen, Zora Folley, etc. but amazngly<br />

his schedule was clear to fight Pete Rademacher -- WHO NEVER HAD ONE PRO FIGHT.<br />

I find that amazing. Nice guy or no, Patterson was a coward when it came to<br />

defending his title. |<br />

|1/6/05 08:56:11 AM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Sonny Liston was dominating against<br />

Leotis Martin until he got hit. Sonny even scored a knocked down in the fourth<br />

round with a left hook. Anyway, it's true, Sonny was never involved in a long<br />

battle or in a legendary fight,apart the SHOOK UP THE WORLD FIGHT. That's<br />

why I too doubt about his heart and stamina. We'll never know whether he was a<br />

true warrior or not.|<br />

|1/6/05 10:25:26 AM|charles|ark.||ctjjandfam@aol.com||||10|sonny was more a<br />

warrior than patterson, who i really thought was a blown up light heavyweight at<br />

the best. he gave jerry trouble because of his experience. had jerry fought him<br />

at his peak he would have destoyed floyd.|<br />

|1/6/05 11:07:13 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|One of the<br />

recent posts here put it best---when you depend on intimidation to win half the<br />

battle, you're in trouble when you face off against someone who isn't easily<br />

intimidated. It's why someone like Tyson was dismantled by Douglas and<br />

Holyfield. Also, although Ali didn't rely on intimidation, he certainly did<br />

count on his mystique to baffle, confuse and panic his opponents. As a longtime<br />

fan of Ali, I can tell you that Frazier and to an even greater extent, Norton<br />

(two guys I hated back then because of how much I loved Ali) were able to beat<br />

Ali because he didn't get into their head. In hindsight, I especially admire<br />

Norton, because I really don't think he had the talent or experience to fight<br />

Ali so effectively---but he was able to convince himself that he belonged in the<br />

same ring with Ali and he didn't let Ali's tactics bother him--not even a<br />

little. I think Ali did get inside Fraizer's head, but Joe shook it off and he<br />

was the animal that Norton wasn't---and willed himself to fight Ali well. |<br />

|1/6/05 11:24:41 AM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Angelo-Interesting comment ! I<br />

think that the second Ali-Norton fight was really impressive as Ali' was really<br />

in top shape, focused and angryand danced throughout the entire fight; but<br />

still I had Norton ahead by at least 1 point at the end of the fight. <strong>The</strong> second<br />

half of that fight was really GREAT. |<br />

|1/6/05 11:50:01 AM|Fan|Fandom||Fan@Fandom.com||||10|<strong>The</strong> second Norton-Ali fight<br />

was the best of the trilogy. It is one of the more entertaining fights of the<br />

whole period and really gets lost in the shuffle. Norton on that night would<br />

have beaten prime Larry Holmes. It was Norton at his best, and Ali at his best<br />

post exile. |<br />

|1/6/05 12:13:27 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Maybe I'm<br />

partial, but I had Norton winning the first fight, Ali winning the second (not<br />

easily, but clearly) and Ali barely winning the third and lucky to survive with<br />

his title. I admit that if I didn't know either fighter, I might give Norton a<br />

slight edge, but that's not how I think the fight should be judged. Put in the<br />

context of a challenger trying to take the title from a long-time champion,<br />

Norton didn't do enough to win. Yes, Ali's history gave him an inherent edge<br />

that Norton had to overcome---and I don't think he did enough to overcome it.<br />

That's how title fights are often judged, and not just Ali's. One exception to<br />

this was Hagler/Leonard, but then again, Leonard was himself a great champion.<br />

I think Ali outboxed Norton in the second fight which was at best for<br />

Norton, a draw, but really, I think Ali outpointed him.|<br />

|1/6/05 12:14:31 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|John Gerald,<br />

it was Cus who wouldn't sign up for a fight against certain fighters. Floyd was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!