09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that he beat ? Ellis ? <strong>Quarry</strong> ? Both are very good heavyweights, but neither are<br />

realistically up there as all time greats. Nup. For mine, Frazier ducked<br />

fighting too many fighters of his era to be considered a truly great legend. If<br />

you guys want to put Frazier right up there, then how good does that make<br />

Foreman ? And then how good does that make Ali ?I believe that Frazier<br />

benefitted from the hatred towards Ali. <strong>The</strong>re were so many boxing fans that<br />

wanted Ali's butt kicked, that Frazier became idolised because he was seen as<br />

the most likely to do it. But be fair......why does Joe's resume have so<br />

many holes in it ? |<br />

|8/17/04 06:24:51 AM|Eugene|Roma, but born in Pisa||Ray Impelletiere is the<br />

greatest.com||||10|Yes, I have to admit there is something true in what you are<br />

saying. But Frazier was part of 3 of the best heavyweight fights I have ever<br />

seen(8 March, Manilla, <strong>Quarry</strong> 1) and to me it is already enought to rate him<br />

among the champions. Whatsmynamesucker-Frazier would have been an interesting<br />

fight. Terrell's shoe size against Frazier's stubborn aggression and punching<br />

power.I think that Joe Frazier's chin was very good, not quite in the same<br />

class (or even league) with McCall, Chuvalo,Peralta and Ali', but very good.|<br />

|8/17/04 06:59:49 AM|Fran|philly||plc7755@aol.com||||10|After the first Ali<br />

fight Joe's career changed he had climbed the mountain and he was done. He did<br />

choose his opponents. His size and style didn't make for a long career. Ali's<br />

did. No matter how you look back on it if you were watching back then you<br />

remember he was the man during the time of Ali's exile. Why he fought Foreman<br />

I'll never know. He didn't need Foreman he was champ. He could have let Ali or<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong> fight him and take the winner just like he did with Mac Foster who was<br />

the #1 contender in 70 he let <strong>Jerry</strong> fight him. Frazier was from 68 to 71 the<br />

best out there. So you guys make good points, my only point is that time and the<br />

longevity factor and fighting Foreman have diminished Fraziers place in history.<br />

He was great with that head movement and Philadelphia left hook and always in<br />

top shape. |<br />

|8/17/04 07:27:25 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|I think Ali and<br />

Foreman were head and shoulders above the rest of their period. Frazier was<br />

very, very good, but Foreman revealed him. Plus he ducked Liston early in his<br />

career, and Lyle, Norton, and Shavers later on. He was in terrible shape against<br />

Foreman, Stanader, and Daniels. Mike Tyson does not have 10% of Joe's gameness<br />

or will to win. Frazier was also one of the greatest (if not the greatest) in-<br />

fighters of all time. I respect him very much. |<br />

|8/17/04 11:24:25 AM|Fran|philly||plc7755@aol.com||||10|John If Ali was head<br />

and shoulders above Frazier then how come joe whupped him in the first fight<br />

knocked him down and broke his jaw. Gave him hell in the next 2 fights. Norton<br />

beats him in thier first fight breaks his jaw and the next 2 were very close.<br />

Either one of those 2 series of fights could have gone against Ali. That is more<br />

like a short hair rather than head and shoulders isn't it. Jimmy Young beat Ali<br />

but didn't get the decision, Jimmy Young also beat Foreman. |<br />

|8/17/04 11:36:20 AM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Maybe Jimmy Old is the greatest<br />

heavyweight of all time ! Who knows ? He even gave Norton one hell of a fight !<br />

I have never seen Jimmy in the ring.|<br />

|8/17/04 11:45:20 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Timana<br />

makes very good points about Frazier---I've always put Joe in the company of the<br />

alltime greats, Ali and Foreman, but I'm the first to admit that I don't have a<br />

reasonable response to debate what Timana has stated. This isn't the first time<br />

that someone on this board has challenged Frazier's legacy---and made some very<br />

valid points. <strong>The</strong> theme is that Frazier's opponents after 1970 weren't the top<br />

of the division, except for Ali and Foreman, and his combined record against<br />

those guys is 1-4 (including a decision win and three KO losses).And yes,<br />

the truth of the matter is that fighting Ellis and <strong>Quarry</strong>, who he already<br />

defeated, seemed to be the path of least resistance considering that Lyle,<br />

Norton and Shavers were on the scene, fighting Foreman, Ali and eachother.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!