January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

TRYING, IT WON'T HAPPEN..|
|7/18/06 10:04:42 AM|Sonia Hathaway(Quarry)|Joshua Tree,
Ca||Sonia2163@aol.com||||10|We are not idiots and how dare you, slander us. I
will stick up for my family til the day I die, that is what I learned from my
Father Jimmy, my Mother Roberta, and my Grandma Marie. I know my sister will
too. if you have anything else to say you know my email address use it. Ok now
lets get back to boxing.|
|7/18/06 09:34:49 PM|Kathleen Quarry-
Mauger|California||Maugermom@msn.com||||10|It seems that this site needs some
guide lines as to what should and shouldn't be discussed. This site was an idea
and dream of two men who wanted other boxers to have a chance to talk with other
boxers to discuss their careers to speak with their fans. A place where a fan
can express his or herself about a sport or and event where life was at work,
playing, cheering, being a part of good fun, the american way. Jerry and Jim
were just men, doing a job, doing it extremely well, as best as they could.
They did not flont their personal lives or their family's. This site needs to
be given back to the people. Family matters should be directed to their
personal e-mail addresses and not aired for debate. I love all of you, I've
diapered every cotton pick of you, do I need to do this again?...be ladies and
gentlemen, as would Jerry and Jim, and Mike.|
|7/19/06 07:37:38 AM|Sabrina|florida||???????||||10|MY DAD ALWAYS SAID EVERYONE
IS ENTITLED TO THEIR OPINION.AND I JUST VOICED MY OPINION.IT'S NOT MY FAULT IF
THE TRUTH HURTS.I'M TIRED OF PEOPLE TRASH TALKING MY FATHER, IT'S BEEN GOING ON
SINCE I CAN REMEMBER.JUST REMEMBER PEOPLE IF IT WASN'T FOR MY FATHER(JIMMY)
THERE WOULD BE NO JERRY QUARRY FOUNDATION.AND KATHY, MY MOTHER CHANGED MY
DIAPERS BECAUSE NONE OF THE QUARRY FAMILY WANTED ANYTHING TO DO WITH US ALL OF
OUR LIVES.I DON'T NEED ANY OF THEM.THE WAY ARWANDA AND DIANNA TREATED MY FATHER
WHEN HE WAS DYING WAS TOTALLY WRONG, POKING HIM IN THE CHEST AND THROWING HIS
WIFE OUT RIGHT AFTER HE DIED..WHAT A BUNCH OF LOSERS!!!!!!!|
|7/19/06 12:51:59 PM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|I just heard that Silvester Stallone
will play as (or will be) The Italian Stallion in Rocky 6.Who would win
Holyfield-Norton prime vs prime ? I think it's hard to say!|
|7/19/06 03:59:52 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron||||10|Massimo: I'm on the
fence about Norton vs. Holyfield. I could see Norton winning a close decision.
I think Norton would gain confidence as the fight wore on, feeling as though he
would not lose by KO. When Norton wasn't intimidated, he was hard to beat. I
think he would win the second half of the fight and get a split decision. |
|7/20/06 02:51:47 AM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Angelo-Even if I don't know
what "being on the fence" means, I think you're probably right. Norton performed
great against Holmes, and Larry was abetter overall fighter than Holyfield,
even if probably a worse puncher.|
|7/20/06 08:57:43 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron||||10|Massimo: On the
fence means undecided! It's like being on top of a fence and not knowing which
side to jump down so you're stuck on the fence and can't decide what to do!|
|7/21/06 08:52:34 AM|Angelo|Washington, DCf||funktron||||10|Massimo: I'm not so
sure that Holyfield was a better puncher than Holmes. Holyfield failed to stop
Holmes or Foreman when they were 10-15 years past their prime. These fights
went to decisions---and meanwhile, Holmes managed to stop Earnie Shavers, Leroy
Jones, Mike Weaver, Gerry Cooney, etc.|
|7/21/06 10:48:20 AM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Angelo-I was very impressed
by the way Holyfield stopped Tyson in their first fight. He hurt him big time. I
think that Tyson could take a punch, he proved it for instance against Ruddock
(especially in the second fight) and Douglas. I'm also very surprised that an
old Holmes did much better than a 30 years old Tyson against Holyfield. But what
you say is right. Maybe Tyson was weaker than I thought. I have seen Holmes in
his prime only twice (against Marvis Frazier and Scott Frank) so I can judge him
only by his record. Let's say that I am on the fence about Holyfield and Holmes