09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

game the way LT did. |<br />

|1/9/06 05:12:33 PM|Steve|na||NA||||10|Angelo,since you mentioned it.I would<br />

like to give you my opinion onNorton vs Hollyfield.That's a real tough<br />

one.Hollyfield was a throwback to the seventies.I think Norton was<br />

stronger,based on his seeming indiference to Ali's power.He was also much more<br />

methodical and disciplined in his attack.He showed his true trading punches<br />

power against Larry Holmes.Hey, I don't even like him.Just trying to be<br />

objective. |<br />

|1/9/06 05:17:52 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Steve: Same<br />

here---As a kid, I didn't like Norton because he gave my guy Ali so much<br />

trouble. Now, I look back on Norton's career and give him much credit for<br />

beating Ali, <strong>Quarry</strong>, Young---giving Holmes the fight of his life. Still, I<br />

watch Norton vs. Foreman, Shavers and Cooney, and wonder about his chin. On the<br />

other hand, Holyfield didn't have the KO power of Cooney, Foreman or Shavers,<br />

not by a long shot. Norton-Holyfield is a tough fight to call.|<br />

|1/9/06 07:02:55 PM|Kent|Murrieta, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Angelo, I<br />

would have to go with Bowe over Norton, prime verses prime. Bowe had both size,<br />

strength an skill at his best and he also showed a lot of heart in his fights<br />

with Holyfield.I am not sure if it would be a knockout or not but you<br />

can't write Norton off as he did have an excellent jab and overhand right hand,<br />

plus an unothrodoxed style that can throw a lot of people off.I have to<br />

agree that Holyfield and Norton is a pick em fight. I think <strong>Quarry</strong> is also hard<br />

to pick a winner verses Holyfield but the cut factor always was present as far<br />

as <strong>Jerry</strong> goes but if he isn't cut, he would have a good chance against either of<br />

them.I know FYI thinks <strong>Jerry</strong> was too small but consider some of<br />

Holyfield's biggest fights were at under 210 pounds, not that much bigger than<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> was at about 197 to 202 pounds at his best and <strong>Jerry</strong> was strong, stronger<br />

than some fighters who were bigger than him. Remember when he lifted Ali off of<br />

his feet and put him up on the ropes in their second fight?I know <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

didn't show much in that fight as he just seemed to plod after Ali and take<br />

punches without landing many effectively but that moment in the first round did<br />

show <strong>Jerry</strong> was physically strong.|<br />

|1/9/06 10:54:31 PM|Ed|Cicero N Y||mooseygoop@aol.com||||10|Angelo,I'd<br />

pick Bowe by ko over Norton. In his prime Bowe had terrific power and i think<br />

he'd find Norton's chin weak spot.I think Holyfield would get a hard<br />

earned decision over Norton. Holyfield was as tough as they come especially in<br />

big fights. My thinking is Norton would have his moments but lose in the late<br />

rounds.P S Did you know that, a few years ago, <strong>The</strong> Ring magazine ranked<br />

Holyfield the 3rd greatest heavyweight champion of all time?|<br />

|1/10/06 08:12:20 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|I think<br />

Holyfield was a superb fighter at his best, but he has badly tarnished his<br />

legacy by hanging around so long. It's one thing to fail at a comeback, or stay<br />

a couple years too long and lose to one or two guys who you could have beaten in<br />

younger days---but Holyfield has had another whole career of losses and has<br />

become a bit of a joke. It's too bad.Kent---consider this: If <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong><br />

came up in today's era, maybe he WOULDN'T BE in the high 190's or low 200's.<br />

With today's nutrition and training advances, he might have been a solid 210-212<br />

pound fighter at his best, and a few pounds heavier later in his career. This<br />

goes for other athletes too---I talked about pro football linemen being huge<br />

today---I don't think it's necessarily human evolution, but instead different<br />

diets, training, supplements, etc. Maybe today, the classic Minnesota Vikings<br />

front line guys would all be 300 pounders!! |<br />

|1/11/06 09:42:52 AM|Ultra Ray|Kansas||worldboxing.com||||10|Hi, I understand<br />

Mike <strong>Quarry</strong> is in a nursing home. Does anyone know the status of his condition?<br />

Does he remember people, are vistors allowed, does he like receiving mail...|<br />

|1/11/06 09:42:58 AM|Ultra Ray|Kansas||worldboxing.com||||10|Hi, I understand<br />

Mike <strong>Quarry</strong> is in a nursing home. Does anyone know the status of his condition?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!