09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

|6/13/05 01:45:15 PM|Massimo |Roma||4||||10|I have just listened to (on the<br />

Internet) "Night train" written (or just sang, I don't know) by a guy named<br />

Oscar Peterson (Sonny Liston's favorite song). It's a nice music, not bad at<br />

all, very suitable (dictionary, it means "adatta") for training. If I was a<br />

boxer, maybe I would train with "Night Train", just like Sonny used to do. I'd<br />

like to see more Sonny Liston's fights on TV. He was a great champion, but the<br />

only fights they show are those with Clay (no Muhammad Ali', Clay was his slave<br />

name and he is no longer a slave) and with Patterson. |<br />

|6/13/05 03:46:52 PM|Kent|Murrieta, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Angelo, in<br />

the Pinklon Thomas fight, the first Frank Bruno fight, and the Tony Tucker<br />

fight, Tyson showed that he could at least overcome some adversity and still win<br />

and while none of these fighters are all time greats, they were legitimate world<br />

class fighters in any era, good opponents, capable of beating, on their best<br />

nights, an all time great. <strong>The</strong> Michael Spinks fight was also an impressive win<br />

because Tyson defeated a fighter who had beaten long time champion Larry<br />

Holmes.Tyson had a period where he could be considered for great status,<br />

no matter that the period didn't last long. I rate him about the top 20 of all<br />

time, no less than number 25.|<br />

|6/13/05 04:14:32 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Kent, no,<br />

Frank Bruno was NOT capable of beating an all-time great on a good night.<br />

That's ridiculous. Somehow, on his best night, I couldn't see Bruno finding a<br />

way to beat, for example, George Foreman, Muhammad Ali, Joe Louis, Larry Holmes-<br />

--fill in the blanks. Frank Bruno? Pinklon Thomas and Tony Tucker? Names<br />

Kent, you're listing names. <strong>The</strong>y were contenders of their era, pretty good<br />

fighters. I'll agree with you that Tucker made Tyson work for the win. But I<br />

don't think he made Tyson "overcome adversity." Horace Robinson made Gerry<br />

Cooney work for a win. That's what trial horses do. Joe Frazier made Muhammad<br />

Ali overcome adversity in Manilla. <strong>The</strong>re's a gigantic difference. But your<br />

assessment of Tyson being Top 20, no lower than 25 isn't far off the mark. 20<br />

year old Mike Tyson was an intimidator with power, speed, focus and most<br />

importantly, an abundance of confidence. Tyson was also smarter than people<br />

give him credit for---he knows boxing history, knows the heavyweights in<br />

particular. He wanted a place in boxing history books and he got it, though not<br />

the way he probably envisioned it 15 years ago. On any given night, Tyson<br />

could get someone good in trouble and finish them off with a furious exchange of<br />

punishment---he had leverage on his punches that spelled lights out for a lot of<br />

opponents. But when tested, really tested, he didn't have the extra intangible<br />

needed to elevate himself over the rest. Kent, Tyson could, on any given night,<br />

beat all except 5-10 heavyweights ever. But based on performance, consistency,<br />

record, etc., I'd put him no higher than 15 and maybe lower. He could probably<br />

beat someone like Frazier, but I'd hesitate to rank him higher than Frazier on<br />

an all-time list. |<br />

|6/13/05 04:36:46 PM|Steve|na||na||||10|Kent,I respectfully disagree with you on<br />

your opinion of the top eighties fighters that were fed to Tyson during his<br />

heyday.<strong>The</strong>y would not have been considered world class contenders in the<br />

seventies.Pinklon Thomas,Tony Tucker,Frank Bruno,Razer Ruddick,and<br />

,c,mon,Michael Spinks?Do you really think any of these guys ,especialy Michael<br />

Spinks,could whip Frazier,Norton,<strong>Quarry</strong>,Foreman? As for fighting through<br />

adversity in Tyson,s fights,isn't that what he's supposed to do?Unless the<br />

fights where mismatches. |<br />

|6/13/05 04:58:01 PM|Steve|na||na||||10|Kent,Angelo beat me to the post with the<br />

exact same opinion.I still think <strong>Quarry</strong>,Frazier,and Foreman would have had a<br />

better than even chance of beating Tyson at his best.Please don't say that<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong> caught Lyle or Shavers as they where coming up.<strong>The</strong> fact that they did so<br />

well after lossing to <strong>Quarry</strong>,only reinforces my high opinion of <strong>Quarry</strong>.|<br />

|6/13/05 07:02:31 PM|Kent|murrieta, ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Your guys'<br />

points are well taken. Maybe Bruno, Thomas, and Tucker couldn't beat all time

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!