09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

|3/21/05 04:04:54 PM|Massimo |Roma||4||||10|Steve-With the Chaos <strong>The</strong>ory<br />

you need NOT LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS and a pretty big brain !!Not<br />

linear problems are UN GRAN CASINO (very difficult). As far as I understand<br />

about shapes re-occuring in Physics [and I'm not the Ali' of Physics, I'm just a<br />

Frazier ( a bum)] they are only a coincidence because the micro and the macro<br />

wordls work in a quite different way. Quantum Mechanics allows you to understand<br />

the micro. In the macro wordl you have (say) 1,1.00000001, 1.00000002,<br />

1.00000003 while in themicro one you have (say) 1,5,10,15 speaking very<br />

brutally. Micro and macro wordls are deeply different.|<br />

|3/21/05 04:31:48 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|<strong>The</strong> most<br />

likely time a Frazier verses Ron Lyle fight could have happened would have been<br />

in 1975. Lyle had rebounded from the loss to <strong>Quarry</strong> with wins over Ellis,<br />

Bonevena, Peralta, and Kirkman and he ended up fighting Ali in May of 1975. <strong>The</strong><br />

Frazier verses Ellis 2 fight happened in March of 1975 and although some of you<br />

think Lyle should have been Frazier's opponent instead, it could have been<br />

possible Lyle didn't want a fight with Frazier at that time. Lyle likely knew<br />

he was getting the title fight with Ali in May, despite losing to Jimmy Young in<br />

Febuary and that taking the Frazier fight could have resulted in two losses,<br />

causing him to lose his title shot. Plus it was too short of a time to prepare<br />

for Frazier.Before 1973 and even 1974, Lyle was too inexperienced for<br />

his management to put him in with a former champion like Frazier and this was<br />

obviouly not a money fight from Frazier's point of view. This might have been<br />

different if Lyle didn't lose to <strong>Quarry</strong> but he did lose.Shavers, also<br />

was not an attractive money opponent for Frazier in 1974 to 1975 because he had<br />

lost to <strong>Quarry</strong> in December of 1973 and to Bob Stallings in 1974 as well as<br />

fighting a draw with Young. Shavers might have been a decent money fight for<br />

Frazier briefly in 1973 after he had knocked out Young in their first fight and<br />

Ellis but he blew this chance by losing to <strong>Quarry</strong> and Stallings. <strong>The</strong> draw in the<br />

second Young fight didn't help him any either.Before 1973, Shavers was a<br />

non entity who had a loss to Ron Stander, who is being maligned here by some in<br />

these pages for being a bum.If Frazier was still a viable fighter in<br />

1976 and afterwards, and he didn't fight Lyle or Shavers, then I would say he<br />

was avoiding them but by that time he had faded from the scene with only his ill<br />

fated second fight with Foreman, which he would never have taken if he was<br />

avoiding punchers.|<br />

|3/21/05 04:37:49 PM|Steve|N.J.||NA||||10|Hey Massimo,then why bring up the<br />

Schrodinger's cat phenomenom?I don't see the relevance.|<br />

|3/21/05 05:16:04 PM|Massimo|Roma||shaq 52-16, lakers 32-34, who knows why<br />

?.com||||10|Steve-Because everyone was wondering whether the parrot was<br />

dead or not so I thought that if the parrots work like the Schrodinger's cat<br />

they are neither dead nor alive. Call it deformazione professionale, because<br />

that's what it is !Angelo- Are you admitting that Ali' was lucky<br />

in Kinshasa and that Foreman was THE REAL GREATEST ? In a row of, say, 10 fights<br />

how many times George would have won ? I'm not sure about that ! George was so<br />

damn strong [nobody could put melons in the heavybags as well as Foreman did,<br />

but I have seen a sinthesis of the first Foreman-Peralta fight and Peralta did<br />

impressively well in that fight ! And Peralta is not an all time great ! |<br />

|3/21/05 05:23:14 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Ali didn't<br />

beat Foreman by luck alone---he trained well, was focused, found strength in<br />

Africa while the fight was postponed---but Foreman suffering that cut in<br />

training (which postponed the fight) didn't help him, the fact that fans were<br />

pulling for Ali was a big psyhological factor against Foreman too. Ali beat<br />

him, there's not doubt. Some say there was a fast count, but the inevitable<br />

finish was Ali by KO. I think that Ali would have beaten Foreman at least half<br />

the time had they fought 10 times. |<br />

|3/21/05 05:54:17 PM|Howard C.|Louisville||howardc@louisville||||10|Hey guys,<br />

I've got a scoop on the show down 'down under' between Frazier and Jimmy '<strong>The</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!