09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eal is to say that Mike Tyson was a complete chump and a loony who was blessed<br />

with athletic talent, something he exhibited against men not of a caliber of the<br />

70s crew. I know anyone can get caught, but Buster Douglas!?On the<br />

subject of complete fighters, which I'm largely bringing up actually, rather<br />

than answering, I can't think of a better, more complete, and flawless fighter<br />

than Roberto Duran. I probably can if I think, one as fundamentally sound and<br />

able to execute, but I doubt I could think of a ~better~ one! He's as much of a<br />

joy to watch work as Frazier, or a young Ali before he started playing offensive<br />

survivor.|<br />

|10/14/03 06:37:01 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Thanks<br />

Muffinman for the compliment and your concern but I don't respond to anything a<br />

certain someone says to me or about me.Massimo, yes Mitch Green had<br />

potential but he had some mental issues that got in the way of his potential.<br />

He was the second fighter to go the distance with Tyson and while he didn't come<br />

close to winning, he did show how holding could be used to frustrate Tyson, a<br />

tactic that Ali, partucularly an older Ali would use effectively. Tyson<br />

didn't turn out to be the next greatest like a lot of people were saying he was<br />

when he was on top but he is in my top ten of all time because when he was at<br />

his best, there are not many people from any era who could beat him. Maybe only<br />

Ali, Louis, Holmes, and Foreman. Joe Frazier would have to escape the first two<br />

rounds and then he might have had a chance. Ironically, our own <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong><br />

would have had a better chance of beating Tyson because of styles than either<br />

Frazier or Ken Norton. Norton too would have to survice that initial outslaught<br />

to have a chance. As I said in an earlier post, <strong>Jerry</strong> would be in real danger<br />

of having his tender cut prone skin busted up by the accurate punching of<br />

Tyson.|<br />

|10/14/03 06:41:18 PM|Gerry Schultz|Ohio||jgschultz11@msn||||9|A lot of things<br />

had to happen for Douglas to beat Tyson that day, if they'd fought 9 more times<br />

at other points in there careers, Tyson wins all of them, it's probably the<br />

greatest upset in sports history, not representative of either man's talent. A<br />

chump? What is that, something you heard on "Starsky and Hutch" ? Boxing is full<br />

of guys from poor backgrounds, Roberto Duran certainly fits this profile. Sonny<br />

Liston, Joe Frazier, Floyd Patterson and many others as well. <strong>The</strong>re's a lot of<br />

cause and effect with this very flawed guy, yes, but those that have managed<br />

Tyson have not taken care of him, they've used him. How many guys have been<br />

champ or damn near champ for 20 years? Tyson is a very rare talent. |<br />

|10/15/03 12:04:18 AM|KOOKOO|NY||kookooclock000@yahoo.com||||10|it is you that<br />

copies me kent, Sonya don't trust this man, it is the clock man that should<br />

guide you. Kent is a man without a soul. He is a giant void, but let not your<br />

heart be troubled, the koo koo clock is here. sweet dreams to all. koo koo|<br />

|10/15/03 02:31:02 AM|Massimo|Rome||4||||10|A name from the past: Tony Tucker !<br />

He gave Tyson a good fight and he would have performed even better if he had not<br />

damaged a hand early in the fight ! A prime Tyson was great but wasn't even<br />

close to being unbeatable ! A prime Tyson lost to Buster Douglas !|<br />

|10/15/03 02:39:17 AM|Massimo|Rome||5||||10|What does it mean "chump" ? I<br />

couldn't find iton the dictionary !|<br />

|10/15/03 03:28:52 AM|Paul|Sydney, Australia||PlMls4@aol.com||||10|Yes, you are<br />

right. Tyson had more than "nothing" and I should have given it more thought<br />

before writing it. <strong>The</strong> point I was trying to make was that he didn't like it if<br />

he couldn't intimidate the other fighter. <strong>The</strong> fight became a lot more even.<br />

Early in his career Tyson was a Top 10 ever fighter and, while I don't think he<br />

could ever beat Ali, Louis, and Foreman, I do think he beats Frazier and perhaps<br />

even Marciano. So saying he had nothing was wrong. He had plenty. However, he<br />

was a squandered talent and maybe because of his upbringing he never really had<br />

a chance. But I still don't think he had the mental toughness to bother Ali and<br />

Louis. Massimo - Ali used to say that Frazier was a 'chump' and not a champ'.<br />

Kooky Clock says you need a hair piece. Why don't you get one like Rocky

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!