09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of fighter's who could have taken <strong>Jerry</strong> on any given night,and vice-versa,but<br />

did they have A CAREER like JQ. I agree with Kent,JERRY was brought up a little<br />

too fast,age 28 to 32 should have been his prime years to go after the title not<br />

22 to 25! hi STEVE(SHEMP)STOOGES ARE FUNNIER THAN CLOWNS!!|<br />

|4/28/04 06:41:57 PM|Evam B.|Belfast||(same)||||7|Right on, G-Man. I'm thinking<br />

that bk is a groovy dude, but using the C word and calling someone's mother a<br />

skanky ho is slam dunk ignorant. You know it, bro, and so do Steve and Angelo<br />

and the whole crew. But I'm past that and have repented. I won't mention any of<br />

that puss again. Anyways, I think that film guy's name is Giancarlo and I'm<br />

thinking that you know this dude much better than you are letting on. |<br />

|4/28/04 07:18:18 PM|G-man|cali||coolio||||8|you sharp Evam I'll giv you that.<br />

<strong>The</strong> truth is I got friendly with the writer and his name is johnny he wrote a<br />

couple other movies. <strong>The</strong> big bald dude I do not know personaly so Im just<br />

covering my own self you hear me? Its not the guy you think, that Im sure.|<br />

|4/29/04 03:25:00 AM|Evan Bearscove|Belfast||(same)||||10|You got that right, G-<br />

Man. Jimmy's a real funny dude, isn't he. 'Stooges are funnier than clowns'.<br />

Gotta remember that one for the guys down the bar. Just have to think up a<br />

context in which to use it, so I can nail it like Jimmy just did. Might wait<br />

until they've had a bunch to drink. Something along the lines of working out who<br />

are the clowns and who are the stooges and who might be both. I'll think of<br />

something. Anyways, I hope you remember that guy about the film. Suppose there<br />

is lots of big, fat bald guys around. Be easy to mix all them dudes up. Later.|<br />

|4/29/04 04:57:28 AM|Fran|Philly||plc7755@aol.com||||10|Good points about <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

having so many tough fights and being worn out at 30. I disagree about Spinks<br />

win against Ali being a fluke. Leon was sharp strong hungry and very well<br />

schooled with some of the latest techniques that even Ali hadn't seen at the<br />

time. <strong>Jerry</strong> on the other hand could have beaten Ali at his best he didn't need<br />

to catch him on the way down. Tonight I am recieving an award in PA for<br />

some amatuer championships I won. Have no clue what to say but I'd like to<br />

mention my inspiration to get into boxing <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong>. Take care evryone.|<br />

|4/29/04 05:56:58 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|I don't want to<br />

start the JQ vs. Foreman thing again, as I posted many times, I think George<br />

would have won. It was a matter of a very good one fighting a great one.<br />

Regarding a third Ali-<strong>Quarry</strong> fight, Ali simply had too much cutting power in his<br />

fists for <strong>Jerry</strong> to handle. <strong>Jerry</strong> beat some very good ones, lost to some great<br />

ones. |<br />

|4/29/04 07:43:49 AM|Party Pooper|Here||14u@ifeltathigh.com||||5|C'mon, <strong>Quarry</strong><br />

was a good fighter. He was not a great fighter. Champion in another era? Only<br />

against fluke champions, ones who got their clocks cleaned by greats. <strong>The</strong>re are<br />

lots of fighters who coulda, woulda, shoulda, if everything was perfect. <strong>The</strong><br />

fact is that the greats DID. He didn't. He lost big against greats, and lost too<br />

against some not so greats. It's ridiculous to say he was great because at his<br />

peak, he coulda beat Ali when he'd crashed. |<br />

|4/29/04 07:45:57 AM|Fran|Philly||plc7755||||10|<strong>Jerry</strong> was always dangerous and<br />

had the power. <strong>The</strong> first Ali fight he would have won if not for the cut. Ali was<br />

tired and it was only the 3rd round. |<br />

|4/29/04 08:01:00 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock29z@yahoo.com||||10|FRAN: <strong>Jerry</strong> was a<br />

fine fighter and a fine man, but he never under any circumstances could have<br />

beaten Ali. As far as Ali being tired, well he had not fought for 3 and a half<br />

years and still came back to beat the #1 contender. Ali dod not come back<br />

against stiffs like Tyson did after his jail time. Give the man credit where<br />

credit due. As far as <strong>Jerry</strong> "having the power" if hitters like Liston, Foreman,<br />

Shavers could not stop Ali, do you really think <strong>Jerry</strong> could? Let's be honest in<br />

our memory of <strong>Jerry</strong> -- a fine man, very good boxer, courage to spare. But lets<br />

also be honest in our memory of his contemporaries.|<br />

|4/29/04 08:48:06 AM|Party Pooper|Here||14u@ifeltathigh.com||||5|<strong>Quarry</strong> couldn't<br />

have beat Ali in his dreams. <strong>The</strong> cut only shortened the inevitable. Ali was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!