09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that prime against prime he would have had a very good chance of beating Norton.<br />

Ring Magazine in 1998 rated <strong>Jerry</strong> the 27th best heavyweight of all time. That<br />

is about right. |<br />

|5/18/02 07:44:52 PM|steve|N.J.||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|i'm having trouble<br />

with the idea of a fighter preparing for a title fight,having a serious back<br />

injury,and his trainers and manager never picking up on it!i seem to remember<br />

ali postponing a title fight for a hernia.just for fun , transpose holmes back<br />

ten years,then match him against late sixties and early seventies<br />

heavywieghts.my point being in all this conjecture,that,given the superior<br />

competion of the time,and perhaps a better management team,quarry could have<br />

very easily rated above both ellis and holmes,and again , norton,who seemed to<br />

both fear and resent quarry, and was managed well enough to wait till jerry was<br />

used up before fighting him.|<br />

|5/18/02 08:30:14 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||oriononside@aol.com||||10|Steve, I am<br />

not sure why <strong>Jerry</strong>'s management, at the time his father Jack <strong>Quarry</strong> and Johnny<br />

Flores, didn't listen to <strong>Jerry</strong> when he complained about being in pain. James<br />

and Mike <strong>Quarry</strong> have both said their brother fought Ellis with a back injury and<br />

James told me <strong>Jerry</strong> was put into a body cast not long after the fight. <strong>Jerry</strong> is<br />

rated above Jimmy Ellis in most all time rankings and rightly so, as <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

overall was the better fighter. That is not to take anything away from Ellis,<br />

who was a fine fighter in his own right. I find myself in a rare instance when<br />

I appear to not be on <strong>Jerry</strong>'s side when it comes to saying Larry Holmes was the<br />

better fighter. I am one of <strong>Jerry</strong>'s biggest fans and of course I think the<br />

world of the <strong>Quarry</strong> family, Holmes was a master boxer, a top ten all time great<br />

who would be a champion in just about any era. Like I said, the ring magazine<br />

rankings of the all time greatest heavyweights was fair in regards to placing<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> at number 27 in their list of the top fifty of all time. I think he is<br />

about number 20 to 25 but number 27 is objective. |<br />

|5/18/02 09:06:37 PM|steve|nj||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|holmes'difficulty with<br />

norton,weaver,his lack of competion in his era,make me think he was an<br />

overexalted copy of ali.how would he have fared against joe frazier,george<br />

foreman,a prime ken norton,or even , yes , a prime quarry?for all his boxing<br />

skills,he seemed to turn some fights into wars.shavers,cooney. |<br />

|5/19/02 05:12:01 AM|mark |southsea||mark.burgess7@ntlworld.com||||10|I have<br />

just read an article from the philadelphia weekly dated 26 dec 2001 about the<br />

sad life of jimmy young who has been battling drug addiction and apparently<br />

suffering from dementia pugilistica, the very same condition in which jerry<br />

quarry suffered from. Young like quarry did not duck<br />

anybody,shavers,norton,ali,foreman,cooney,lyle,dokes,page, to name a few but now<br />

as he fights his biggest battle i hope and pray there is some light at the end<br />

of the tunnel! I personally think young was one of best<br />

heavyweights there has been,i think wins over lyle,foreman plus very<br />

controversial losses to ali & norton and a debatable draw with shavers confirm<br />

this.I also think if young kept his weight and conditioning together<br />

particularly after the norton fight he could of been world champ(well WBA champ<br />

young i dont think would have beaten holmes for the WBC title).|<br />

|5/19/02 04:19:43 PM|Daniel|San Francisco,Ca.||CORERMAN@AOL.COM||||8|<strong>Quarry</strong> was<br />

a unpredictable fighter who could have beaten Foreman if Foreman had analyzed<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong> from his fights with Ellis,Chuvalo,Ali and Frazier.You never knew what<br />

mind set <strong>Quarry</strong> had going into a fight ala Spencer,Mathis, Foster, Shavers and<br />

Lyle. I think <strong>Quarry</strong> would be up for Foreman circa 1971-early 1974.|<br />

|5/20/02 09:26:04 AM|Gerry Schultz|ohio||jgschultz@firstam.com||||9|To respond<br />

to Evren, I beleive having the abilty to defeat someone, and being a better<br />

overall fighter than someone are not the same thing. <strong>Quarry</strong>, in my opinion was<br />

clearly a better boxer than Frazier, and clearly had the edge after Round 2 in<br />

their first fight, so he did have the ability to defeat him. <strong>The</strong>re are some<br />

interesting similarities between the two, both known for their courage,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!