09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

canvas to win a fight. He was a good heavyweight champ, but not a great one.<br />

He didn't dedicate himself the way a great champion does. And by the way, this<br />

isn't a matter of saying Tyson couldn't, for example, beat Joe Frazier. But it<br />

is saying that in context, Frazier was a great of his time and Tyson wasn't.<br />

Just because styles make fights, maybe Tyson could win a match with Frazier.<br />

But Frazier showed more over a longer period and in my opinion, won or was<br />

competitive in more great fights. Tyson might have just enough left to get<br />

another couple paydays, but wow, Danny Williams!|<br />

|8/2/04 11:34:54 AM|Forest Ward|NYC||NYC.COM||||10|Whenever, I make a post on<br />

this site I always leave my name, Forest Ward. I don't have the need to write<br />

something under a different name.|<br />

|8/2/04 11:50:59 AM|Joe Krause|Chicago||sadmspats@yahoo.com||||10|Tyson was a<br />

great front-runner. <strong>The</strong> quality of his opposition was downright mediocre and it<br />

never allowed us to see if Tyson was more than just an offensive machine. <strong>The</strong><br />

best fighter that Tyson ever faced when considering prime years etc? Tony<br />

Tucker. Tucker gave Tyson some problems, but Tyson was too ferocious at that<br />

time. Holmes wasn't even close to being prepared or in his prime, Spinks was<br />

already retired in his own mind before the Tyson fight and was just getting one<br />

more pay day. Look at the rest of the names. <strong>The</strong> first "real" test for Tyson<br />

was his 18th fight against Jesse Ferguson. A nice fighter, hardly a world-<br />

beater. A couple fights later he beats a past-prime James Tillis. Destroys a<br />

fragile Marvis Frazier a coujple fights later. Title fights- Berbick, Smith,<br />

Pinklon Thomas. All credible guys, no great fighters. <strong>The</strong>n Tucker and Biggs,<br />

Holmes, Tubbs, Spinks. It isn't Tyson's fault that at his peak the fighters<br />

that were around were just fair. However it will never allow us to know exactly<br />

what his legacy was. At least Holmes had Norton, hell Cooney was even better<br />

than all of Tyson's foes save Tucker. <strong>The</strong>n Bruno and Carl <strong>The</strong> Truth. He NEVER<br />

fought a great fighter in his prime. He was always 2 clicks better than<br />

everyone he was fighting. Mike Tyson doesn't beat Joe Frazier, Mike Tyson<br />

doesn't beat George Foreman. Why? Because if the talents were close to equal<br />

Tyson would never be my pick. At that top crust of heavyweight history it takes<br />

a special thing to win fights against other great fighters. Tyson never showed<br />

that skill, and anyone who thinks he has is dealing in just pure conjecture. |<br />

|8/2/04 12:45:03 PM|Sabrina <strong>Quarry</strong>-<br />

Porter|Florida||sabrinalporter@aol.com||||10|Tyson was one hell of a fighter in<br />

his prime...his fights were always great to watch, over quick...but since he bit<br />

Holyfield he doesn't deserve a boxing license..fighters aren't supposed to bite<br />

people.I remember Uncle <strong>Jerry</strong> used to tell me he could whip Tyson with no<br />

problem....Tyson is a LOSER!!!!|<br />

|8/2/04 12:59:40 PM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Let's give Mike Tyson what he deserves<br />

! He did beat a long list of decent fighters: Jesse Ferguson was good, James<br />

Tillis was good, Mitch "Blood" Green was good, Berbick, Smith, Tucker, Tubbs...<br />

Frank Bruno was a mountain of muscles and an excellent fighter with a<br />

devastating punch. Spinks destroyed Cooney,"<strong>The</strong> Lie" Williams was good. Alex<br />

Stewart was good, ask Holyfield and Foreman. When Mike fought Holmes, Holmes was<br />

still a very good heavyweight. After the Tyson fight, he went the distance with<br />

Holyfield and Mc Call and did beat Ray Mercer. He was only 38 when he fought<br />

Tyson. Pretty young for modern standards. Donovan "Razor" Ruddock was very good<br />

! <strong>The</strong> Danny Williams fight means nothing, Tyson was overweight and had fought<br />

only 49 rounds against Clifford in the last twenty years ! It is not only a<br />

matter of who Tyson did beat but HOW he did beat these guys. Berbick was<br />

humiliated, Stewart was humiliated etc.In his prime he was probably a top<br />

ten, even if surely below Ali', Foreman, Frazier, Louis, Spalla and Liston. |<br />

|8/2/04 02:04:27 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|I used to<br />

think Tyson was alltime top ten, but I don't anymore. And by the way, let's<br />

stop with the violins about Tyson not having great fighters in his era to show<br />

his stuff. If he wasn't convicted of rape (and I'm not saying he was guilty in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!