09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I would not have put Joe in with a top ten guy until 1967, giving him time to<br />

move up just like anyone else.Some of the 'contenders' listed weren't even<br />

ranked after 1967, and others only briefly based on the annual ranking<br />

shown.See ing the way Joe went thru the guys he did face, how many of those<br />

contenders were lined up to meet Frazier? "Hey Joe, beat the hell out of me<br />

next", they might say?I don't think so.|<br />

|10/24/05 12:11:16 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|But Kent,<br />

Frazier was still active in 1974, 1975, 1976---Lyle and Shavers were more than<br />

just "prospects" by that time. <strong>The</strong>y were highly ranked fighters, going in<br />

against the Foreman's, the Youngs, Ali and eachother. I find it hard to believe<br />

that Earnie Shavers wouldn't have accepted the chance of a lifetime to fight a<br />

former World Champion, Frazier, for more money than all his previous fights<br />

combined, instead of someone like Ron Lyle---dangerous, but without Frazier's<br />

name recognition. When Frazier took on Ellis on Life Support in Austrailla,<br />

that could have easily been one of the other guys I mentioned. Tune-up, tune-<br />

down, whatever, he didn't go head-to-head with the sluggers. After Foreman<br />

dismantled Frazier in five minutes, I truly don't think Ron Lyle would have been<br />

scared off by Frazier's performance against <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong>---basically beating a<br />

guy he had already beaten previously and had outweighed by a comfortable margin.<br />

I don't believe that for a minute. <strong>The</strong> history shows that Lyle and Shavers<br />

weren't shy about stepping in with anybody at anytime. This is why I've never<br />

bought your contention that they avoided Frazier and he didn't avoid them. When<br />

the entire top ten is facing off against eachother in one 3-4 year period, but<br />

one guy is missing---I've got to believe it's him avoiding them, not the other<br />

way around. Where was Norton? I'll tell you where he was, ranked high,<br />

fighting Ali, fighting Foreman but not fighting Frazier. Lyle: Fighting Ali,<br />

fighting Foreman but not fighting Frazier. Shavers: Fighting Young, fighting<br />

Lyle, later, fighting Ali, but not fighting Frazier. Young: Fighting Lyle,<br />

fighting Shavers (I believe twice each), later, fighting Foreman, but not<br />

fighting Frazier. <strong>The</strong>y were all afraid of ruining their "prospect" status by<br />

losing to Frazier? Baloney. I look at Joe's competition and number of fights<br />

after 1971 and I realize that his management carefully avoided the landmines and<br />

cement that were in Shavers' and Lyle's gloves. Once again, for the record,<br />

Frazier wasn't afraid of anybody and wouldn't duck anybody either. But maybe<br />

his management had reason to "proceed with caution." |<br />

|10/24/05 03:14:50 PM|Pete|Cleveland||N/A||||10|Ok Howard lets go. But before I<br />

begin are you through with the name calling?I have no problem with #1<br />

Robinson, and Armstrong #2 I have a problem<br />

with #3 Gavilan. Great boxer and exciting fighter. But he got a gift against<br />

Billy Graham in the MSG. So he was not that great of a boxer. He got a gift<br />

against Carmen Basilio in Syracuse. I have the tape of that fight. So he could<br />

not out box Basilio as others had done. Also Gavilan was not much of puncher. I<br />

would not have Gavilan at #3Basilio at #4 is not a bad choice. But I<br />

would not have him above Leonard.Trinidad #5 Maybe, but I would not have<br />

him above Grifith or Leonard.Leonard #6 I wuold have him<br />

higher.Whittaker #7 I would not have him above GriffithGriffith<br />

#8 I would have him right up there with and Leonard and not below Trinidad or<br />

Basilio.#9 Napoles, I would not have him below Trindad and<br />

Whittaker#10 Mickey Walker, well I have not seen enough good quality<br />

films of him to make a judgement.See Howard it is possible to disagree<br />

with someone and not to resort to name calling slandering people as you and Noam<br />

have done in the past. Disagreement's can be cordial|<br />

|10/24/05 03:38:28 PM|Kent|Murrieta, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Angelo,<br />

consider that Lyle fought Foreman in 1976 and Shavers never fought Foreman at<br />

all.I don't think Lyle would have fought Foreman in 1975, even if George<br />

was available, at least not before his title shot verses Ali for the same reason<br />

he wouldn't have fought Frazier at that time. Why risk his title shot and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!