09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecognizing Joe as champion and disregarding the WBA tourney. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />

certainly a minority, and any proclamation that <strong>Jerry</strong>-Joe II was some sort of<br />

elimination bout would have meant little. Ali-Foreman was THE fight everyone<br />

wanted, and I agree that nearly everyone thought Foreman would trounce him. I<br />

also agree that <strong>Jerry</strong> was considered the favorite to retire Joe. In hindsight,<br />

given the Alexander and Frazier results, he probably should have been considered<br />

a huge underdog vs Foreman at that time. But I admit I would have lost my shirt<br />

betting on <strong>Jerry</strong>.|<br />

|3/4/05 08:26:28 PM|Steve|N.J.||na||||10|Angelo,Frazier vs Cooney is a good<br />

one.I have to admit I haven't seen much film of Cooney's earlier fights.I can't<br />

remember why.I guess I wasn't paying attention until he suddenly became a hot<br />

contender,and,of course,a big white hope.I must admit,sometimes over the<br />

years,I've been the kind of casual fan who only watches the top dogs.I saw him<br />

knockout Norton.I remember he gave Holmes a very competitive fight for thirteen<br />

rounds.Norton seemed to be vulnarable to anyone who could really crack.Why<br />

didn't Norton ever fight Lyle?Anyway,prime vs prime,I think Frazier would have<br />

introduced Cooney to the term,pressure.Cooney was no Ali or Holmes.I like<br />

Frazier by tko in about five rounds.Remember,Angelo,Foreman had to knock down<br />

Frazier six times.I know Kent argues that Frazier was finished after the first<br />

or second knockdown.I'm not sure what that means.Does that imply the Ref. didn't<br />

do his job?It only took Foreman three shots to dispatch Lyle .Does that mean Joe<br />

could take a shot better than anybody,except Ali?|<br />

|3/4/05 08:37:46 PM|Noam|same||same||||10|Forest, your story doesn't cut it.<br />

I'll background you.Frazier was so confident of beating Foreman that he<br />

didn't insist on a mandatory rematch in the contract. (Hear that Fran - Frazier<br />

felt he was home and didn't need a guarantee of a rematch.)In <strong>January</strong><br />

1973 Foreman knocked the "unbeatable" Joe down six times in 4.35 minutes (a<br />

knockdown every 45 seconds). <strong>The</strong> result was so demoralizing that a thoroughly<br />

beaten Frazier didn't ask for an immediate rematch. Because it was one of the<br />

most lopsided mismatches in heavyweight history, the media and the public were<br />

not clamouring for a rematch either. No one was. People like to move on from<br />

train wrecks.Foreman got on with business. He beat Roman and then<br />

Norton. He looked down from the ring and told Ali he was going to kill him when<br />

they fought. <strong>The</strong> fight with Ali was then arranged. That was the fight everyone<br />

wanted.Meanwhile Frazier had lost his second fight against Ali. <strong>The</strong><br />

loser of two of his past three fights, a rematch between Frazier and Foreman was<br />

the last thing on anyone's minds. After all, Frazier had the patron saint of<br />

lost causes looking after him (help me out here Forest, you study the bible and<br />

knew who that patient guy Job was. Who is the patron saint of lost causes ?)<br />

In June 1974 <strong>Quarry</strong> and Frazier fought. By then Foreman and Ali had<br />

signed to fight in October 1974. Neither <strong>Quarry</strong> or Frazier was the champion.<br />

Neither <strong>Quarry</strong> or Frazier was a mandatory challenger. Neither <strong>Quarry</strong> or<br />

Joe had legal standing whatsoever to demand a title fight. As far as the title<br />

was concerned at that time, they were nobodies. Not the champion. Not a<br />

contracted mandatory challenger. For Forest to imply that <strong>Quarry</strong> or Frazier<br />

could demand anything aptly demonstrates his profound ignorance of the workings<br />

of boxing.It is history now that Ali beat Foreman in October 1974. As<br />

there was no mandatory challenger from any prior elimination bouts, Ali fought<br />

Wepner (March 1975), Lyle (May 1975), Bugner (June 1975), before stopping<br />

Frazier in September 1975.Those are the facts. Forest says otherwise.<br />

Show me the newspaper stories from that era Forest and I'll read them. But a<br />

wise man once counselled me that you shouldn't believe everything you read in a<br />

newspaper.I'd instead rather rely on what Frazier and Foreman say. Go<br />

read their books. Neither claims that the Frazier v <strong>Quarry</strong> second fight was a<br />

recognized elimination bout. No mention of the alleged elimination bout at all<br />

by them. Fact.Besides, Frazier didn't like eliminations. He squibbed out<br />

of the WBA elimination tournament. Remember ?Something else. As champion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!