09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

actually READ the posts. I was RESPONDING to what Kent and Fan said a few days<br />

earlier. I'm allowed to do that, aren't I ? I hadn't read their posts earlier<br />

than that because I was tied up with a death in the family. And what I said was<br />

that the New York title was only recognized by six states. It might not fit<br />

agendas and blinkered views of the past, but that is a verifiable fact. Sorry<br />

for speaking the truth. |<br />

|10/9/05 04:40:43 PM|Noam|same||same||||10|Joey I take on board your comments<br />

but I am at a disadvantage because Gerry doesn't want me talking about it. I'll<br />

be brief, though. I don't doubt that Frazier was better in one-off fights than<br />

the other guys in the WBA tournament. But I think he was worried about putting<br />

in back-to-back hard fights against genuine tough guys. He didn't want Bonavena<br />

then <strong>Quarry</strong> then Ellis to win that tournament. Much easier to win a version<br />

recognized by just six states by fighting the unranked Mathis. Even Frazier<br />

acknowledges in his book that Mathis was easy. Think of this, too. If<br />

Frazier had entered the WBA tournament like all the other ranked guys did, then<br />

there would have been no disputed title. It would have been an undisputed title.<br />

Frazier was the only guy who wouldn't enter it. Regards Norton.<br />

Frazier says in his book that he didn't fight Norton because there was no money<br />

in it. Others say it was because they were buddies. Lots of disseminating there.<br />

I don't know which explanation to believe.|<br />

|10/9/05 11:22:22 PM|Ed|Cicero N Y||mooseygoop||||10|Kent,Yes, that article<br />

pointed out what we all know but don't consider when dealing with a<br />

stranger...That they might do something that we'd never consider doing to a<br />

person such as shooting them or sticking a broken bottle in an eye or any number<br />

of brutal things. Thats why his advice (and hes suppose to be street smart) is<br />

to deflect any attack and get away. It might be a hard thing to do if actually<br />

confronted but I agree with him that its the smartest.|<br />

|10/10/05 04:47:59 AM|Massimo|Roma ||4||||10|Sincere condolences Noam.|<br />

|10/10/05 10:21:52 AM|Kent|Murrieta, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Ed, yes the<br />

best defense when confronted with a street fight is to get away. <strong>The</strong>re are too<br />

many crazies out there.On the rare occasions when I have been<br />

threatened, I always make sure, if there are witnesses present, that they know I<br />

fear for my safety, that I am afraid that this person is going to harm<br />

me.I also let everyone know that I am trying to walk away and not<br />

fight. This has two benefits, one, if I do walk away and avoid the conflict,<br />

always the best choice, and two, if I have to attack this person, it is clear to<br />

the witnesses that I was acting in self defense. <strong>The</strong> law doesn't always see who<br />

the true aggressor is.But the article is also right about getting hit<br />

and hurt. Years ago I was acutally attacked without warning and "sucker<br />

punched" by some crazed guy.It was something the karate dojo didn't<br />

prepare me for, taking a punch, and even the limited sparring I had done with<br />

boxers, didn't help as much as one would think as this guy really hit me hard<br />

and I didn't see it coming, <strong>The</strong>y always say the one you don't see coming knocks<br />

you out.Well he didn't knock me out but he dazed me but for some reason<br />

he didn't follow up on the punch and I was able to recover and take him<br />

down.I was lucky he hesitated after he hit me because if he had been<br />

able to follow up on it, I would have been knocked out or worse. It was the<br />

hardest I have ever been hit and hurt in my life.|<br />

|10/10/05 10:34:16 AM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Kent: Of<br />

course, if the attack occurs in your home (i.e. intruder), basically, you should<br />

not only knock the person out, but follow with blows to the head with an iron<br />

skillet, until the person isn't breathing. If you have a gun, you shoot to<br />

kill. Basically, as you said, the law is a little peculiar in terms of what is<br />

self defense---so you only want one story coming out of the house, and that's<br />

your story. And besides, anyone who would break into my house is a threat to my<br />

family---I wouldn't have a lot of guilt ending it for that person. |<br />

|10/10/05 11:35:38 AM|Joey|T.O.||a||||10|" I think Vitali still has a chance to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!