09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

selected group of guy's, and could not defeat the top rated guys like Holyfield<br />

and Morrison, he was lucky Moorer was champ, I always thought he was a bum and<br />

he proved it against Foreman. Of course when a 45 year old guy can take you the<br />

distance or KO you what does that say for you. It does say Big George is one<br />

hell of a fighter and has a heart that would be be hard to beat. Oh, yeah<br />

Massimo quit your cussin'. And Steve from NJ, It's hard to 'dis a Bro from<br />

Jersey, but <strong>Jerry</strong> was a much better fighter than Ernie Shavers. Shavers had one<br />

thing...the right hand. He didn't jab, had slow hands and footwork,a weak chin<br />

and no endurence. He beat alot of set up's with a few top 20 fighters thrown<br />

it. Jimmy Young was a good prostpect when Shavers clocked him, he was in line<br />

for Frazier's title when Ron Stander pounded him out. He did drop Ron Lyle and<br />

had him hurt until he succumbed to his lack of training and skill. Ernie<br />

Shavers in no way compares with Mike Tyson, who early on, was a fairly complete<br />

fighter. Tyson stops <strong>Quarry</strong> in 2.|<br />

|9/21/03 11:06:50 AM|Roadscholarette|Chicago||roadscholarette@hotmail.com||||10|<br />

Geez, R.S. just because a guy has streach marks doesn't mean<br />

he on the juice>Along with obviously oversized musculature for a given<br />

size, usually combined with dazzling definition, stretch marks are the single<br />

most obvious sign of steroidal use, and are rare in someone who doesn't take<br />

drugs. I'd be curious if Tyson's suffered a lot of little nagging muscle pulls,<br />

also a side effect of steroids, since such a body's frame isn't designed for the<br />

amount of muscle the drugs produce. Tyson's weight is appropriate for an in<br />

shape man of 6'4" at least.. As far as Tyson vs.<br />

Frazier, the early Mike would have KO'ed Joe before the fifth<br />

round. <strong>The</strong> more recent version on Tyson it's a toss-up. Iv'e<br />

always thought Foreman could KO Tyson.>Foreman would likely knock out<br />

Tyson the same way he did Frazier. JF was the greatest inside fighter in boxing<br />

history. Tyson would be in a phone booth with Joe, who would have started faster<br />

than was customary with him. Tyson wouldn't have found Frazier's head, and his<br />

short punches wouldn't have mattered. I'd take five rounds too, but the other<br />

way around. Tyson might have quit from the body punches. I always thought he had<br />

a lot of dog in him. <br />

George is one hell of a fighter and has a heart that would be be<br />

hard to beat.>One of the top five all time greats. I can't think of<br />

another champion who could have even fought at the age at which GF won the<br />

title, let alone captured it. Of course, he didn't take it away from an immortal<br />

or anything, but how many fighters at even 40 are anything but a wreck? In his<br />

prime, there are few who could have stayed with George. Plus, when considering a<br />

fighter's greatness, I like to (along with thinking of his best night, and<br />

overall record), imagine how he'd do if dropped down into the fight of another<br />

great, either against them or their opponent. <strong>The</strong>re isn't a fighter ever, or<br />

their opponent, in any fight, who wouldn't have been in trouble against Foreman<br />

(or Ali, Frazier), though the same can't be said for Tyson, or most of the<br />

current group, save Holyfield. Tyson stops <strong>Quarry</strong> in 2.>If he<br />

didn't cut, I think <strong>Quarry</strong> would have done a little better than that. <strong>The</strong>re were<br />

some who were trickier than JQ, but it isn't a real long list, and Tyson wasn't<br />

one of them. Cleverness was one thing with which Tyson had trouble. As with any<br />

bully, he also had problems with someone who wouldn't quit and threw volumes of<br />

punches, which would have been his downfall against Frazier, and a big part of<br />

it against <strong>Quarry</strong>. |<br />

|9/21/03 11:43:06 AM|Massimo|Rome||gh||||10|Bob-Foreman at 45 fought against<br />

an 29 years Holyfield much better than a 30 y. old Tysondid against a 34 y.<br />

old Holyfield. I don't thinkMoorer was so beat. He was surely a legitimate<br />

top 10, he hadn't a good chin, but he could punchPS; I don't understand what<br />

the espression "quit your coussin " means... Is it an offense ?If it's an<br />

offence I want you in the ring ! You don't have a chance with me, you are too<br />

short, too slow, you have no footwork ... You would be in trouble against me

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!