09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

|8/16/04 05:45:10 AM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Wilton Norman is unusual as a name. I<br />

have never met a Wilton Normain in my entire life. Shaquille Rashaun is unusual<br />

too. On the other hand, Massimo is very common.|<br />

|8/16/04 09:15:23 AM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||kentallenent@aol.com||||10|Massimo,<br />

found my reading glasses. I can see without them to walk around or drive my<br />

car, but I can't read very well without them.Evren, how about the next<br />

fights in the tournament?|<br />

|8/16/04 02:03:29 PM|Fran|philly||plc7755@aol.com||||10|Here are some facts for<br />

Laxalt. <strong>Jerry</strong> Destroyed a very dangerous Ernie Shavers. Shavers destroyed<br />

Norton. Norton beat Ali 3 times only got 1 decision. <strong>Jerry</strong> completely outboxed<br />

Lyle and Lyle fights Foreman in one of the most exciting fights of all time.<br />

Knocking Foreman down a few times. Foreman Destroys Norton and Frazier. No<br />

shoulda woulda coulda. No Fiction just facts. You may not like to hear it but he<br />

beat the best who beat the best. With his briliant career there is no need to<br />

woulda coulda shoulda, he did it I saw him do it and the drama that went with<br />

it. I liked all the fighters of that era including Ali they were all great<br />

atheletes. Some of them got the publicity and some did not. <strong>Jerry</strong> did not and he<br />

was in my humble opinion the most exciting fighter of the ERA. I didn't say he<br />

was the best of the ERA no one did. Smokin Joe probably was. |<br />

|8/16/04 02:25:00 PM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|FRAN: Foreman<br />

easily pulverized Frazier twice, how can you say Frazier was the best of that<br />

era? I always believed that if A beats B, than A is the better guy. Especially<br />

if it happens twice.|<br />

|8/16/04 05:00:49 PM|Timana|Auckland||kiwi@hotmail.com||||10|I thought Fran was<br />

doing okay until he said that Frazier was probably the best of that era. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

are so many unanswered questions with Frazier that Fran's statement is absurd.<br />

Frazier avoided fighting many of the best of that era. Rather than fight<br />

some of the best, he fought others he had already beaten<br />

convincingly.And, of course, after the first Ali fight (in which he<br />

fought brilliantly), he hardly fought at all. Frankly, I thought Frazier<br />

found his level in history in the two fights with Foreman. He was so badly<br />

beaten that he has to be below Foreman. Of course, Foreman has to be below Ali.<br />

To me, Frazier should merely be a footnote in history. Sure, he was able<br />

to lift against a ring rusty Ali, but there are too many holes in his resume,<br />

too many exhibitions, too many recycled fights, and then there was that<br />

embarrassing thrashing against Foreman - TWICE. |<br />

|8/16/04 06:07:20 PM|Massimo|Roma||4||||10|Timana-Sorry, but I don't<br />

agree with you. Yes, it's true, Joe Frazier didn't fight a lot of guys, but how<br />

many of these fighters would have really had a decent chance at winning against<br />

him ? Maybe only Lyle and Shavers. On the other hand, Frazier beat a long list<br />

of excellent fighters: Machen-Jones-Chuvalo-Bonavena-Mathis-<strong>Quarry</strong>-Ellis-Ali'-<br />

Foster. <strong>The</strong> first and the third fight with Ali' would already be enough to<br />

show Joe Frazier's greatness. How many times a fighter has to show how<br />

good he is ? Ali''s career was just exaggerated ! Almost every fight was against<br />

a top contender... Too much ! I rate Ali' above Frazier because( or as, or<br />

since) he beat Foreman while Frazier almost died against Small George, but Joe<br />

Frazier was a real champion !|<br />

|8/16/04 06:18:53 PM|Fran|Philly||plc7755@aol.com||||10|I threw that out there<br />

because even though its true I can't argue with what you are saying about<br />

Foreman beating Joe 2x like he did, but from 68 til the after first Ali fight in<br />

71 Joe was unbeatable. After the first Ali fight he ate good and took off to<br />

long and lost the sharpness to slip n slide like he did during the years before<br />

George. Foreman had his number, styles make fights and Foreman had all the tools<br />

to beat Joe. But Before George, Joe was the man. |<br />

|8/16/04 08:21:25 PM|angelo|dc||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Ali had a better<br />

overall career than Frazier and accomplished a lot more. I'd rate him the best<br />

of the era even though he lost to Frazier in the first fight. Also, say what

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!