09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - July 2006 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

opinion. Holmes, Tyson, Holyfield also, though personally not sure I agree.<br />

Liston was somewhat lost after curious AliII fight, but had been in the ring<br />

since the late 1950's, so might have been beatable by the right fighter, but not<br />

as ripe as you think,Chuck Wepner. Agree with Evren about Earnie Shavers, who<br />

had very high KO%, huge punch, which JQ took very well, but smashed others. He<br />

gave Larry Holmes a great match. A dangerous, underrated heavy. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

confused Don King graduate. Good to see someone mention the Euro-heavies of the<br />

60's, they gave Ali very good matches and deserve their respect. Greatness of<br />

any era usually is made in retrospect. <strong>Jerry</strong> <strong>Quarry</strong>'s era doesn't just stand out<br />

because of the divisions decline since then, it's because of the comparable<br />

talent and depth of the time, which produced four respectable (Ali- legendary)<br />

champions. When else did this occur? So many do not get title shots, yes, but<br />

title shots are earned usually, not given. JQ earned his by beating Patterson, a<br />

former champ, and Spencer who was at least #4. Wins like that usually can't be<br />

ignored, though <strong>Quarry</strong>'s wins over top guys like Lyle, Shavers somehow were.<br />

Some guys like Norton were so dangerous yet not very saleable they were dodged<br />

for years. Clay/Ali knew that if he didn't run his mouth, he might go the way of<br />

Norton, others. Hype can be as important as talent, I guess, in gaining a<br />

titleshot, as Gerry Cooney proved. $$$ |<br />

|8/25/03 03:20:22 PM|Gerry Schultz|Cleveland ,<br />

Ohio||jgschultz11@msn.com||||10|Sorry, to clarify, JQ would beat Floyd at 200,<br />

CW, NOT 190, my goof . Both were under 200 for those matches. I'd take <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

over Foster also. Thanks. Massimo, Wilt and Shaq never played against each<br />

other, that I've heard of. Wilt retired in 1975, but regularly scrimmaged NBA<br />

guys thru the 1980's, and received serious offers to unretire as late as 1990.<br />

He was 54 then and still could play. |<br />

|8/25/03 04:23:48 PM|JIMMY DORSEY|VENTURA<br />

CALIFORNIA||RONNYRAINS@YAHOO.COM||||10|One thing is for sure,whomever Mr.<strong>Quarry</strong><br />

did fight was in shape,Everybody he fought,with in reason was in absolute tip<br />

top shape.Ali,Frazier,Norton,Patterson,Lyle,Shaver,Chuvalo etc, that will tell<br />

you something about the man.|<br />

|8/25/03 05:08:52 PM|Angelo|Washington, DC||funktron@yahoo.com||||10|Regarding<br />

some recent posts: Say what you will about Ali. He might not have fought<br />

technically perfect, but the man had an uncanny ability to size up his opponent,<br />

expose weaknesses and ultimately win fights over just about everyone he fought.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only men who beat him without losing a return match were Larry Holmes and<br />

Trevor Berbick. In both cases, Ali was old and shot, with no reflexes left. In<br />

fact, he managed to beat Spinks in the return match and he was already over the<br />

hill. As for Frazier and Norton, he beat them twice in return matches, though<br />

Norton really seemed to have his number. Still, he totally outclassed every<br />

heavy of the sixties except Frazier and he outclassed the class of the 70's with<br />

the exception of Norton and Holmes, though as pointed out, Holmes caught him<br />

well on the way down. Ali pulled away from punches and kept his hands low<br />

simply because he could! No heavyweight to that point had the hand speed and<br />

footwork of Ali----and his boxing ability and ring generalship were second to<br />

none among fighters of his generation. Yes, Holmes had the better jab, though<br />

Ali's was faster. Other guys had more power, though Ali's was adequate to get<br />

the job done. But the record speaks for itself: <strong>The</strong> man dominated the<br />

heavyweight division over an extended period of time, and that included his<br />

exile---three years that probably would have been his peak as an athlete.As<br />

for the Foreman-<strong>Quarry</strong> fight that never took place: If the fight happened<br />

around 1973-74, I think Foreman would have won by stopping <strong>Jerry</strong> on cuts. If<br />

somehow, someway, <strong>Jerry</strong> could avoid bleeding in a fight against Foreman, he<br />

could have won either by clear decision or his own stoppage. I don't see why<br />

people think it's such a reach to believe that on a good night, <strong>Jerry</strong> could have<br />

won this fight. Beating Lyle and Shavers proved that <strong>Quarry</strong> had the ability to<br />

outhustle, outbox or even outslug the big hitters. No one in the history of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!